• MamboNumber-6@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Because you can’t always fall ass- backwards into having Tom Brady.

    Belichick failed in Cleaveland, succeeded in NE with Brady, and is failing with not-Brady.

    This isn’t difficult.

    • niknight_ml@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Belichick failed in Cleaveland

      He absolutely did not fail in Cleveland. He spent 92 and 93 rebuilding a team that had bottomed out, won a playoff game in 94, and was very much in the playoff hunt at 4-4 going into the weekend that Modell announced he was moving the team to Baltimore. They went 1-6 after that announcement.

    • ank1t70@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Are you stupid? Do you even think for a second before spouting nonsense like this?

      Brady’s first 3 rings were because of the defense. He was a game manager.

      In the losses to the Giants Belichick’s defense allowed under 20 points and Brady could only score 14.

      Against the Seahawks Brady was incredible yet Belichick’s defense won the game with the Malcolm Butler INT.

      Against the Falcons Belichick’s defense allowed 0 points in the second half which is the only reason Brady’s comeback was possible.

      I’ll give you the 2017 Eagles Super Bowl, Brady carried them in that game and Bill’s defense was terrible. Got cooked by Nick Foles.

      And finally, the 2019 Rams Super Bowl where Belichick’s defense allowed 3 points against the best offense in the league so Brady won a ring while scoring only 13 points…

      I’m not trying to discredit anyone here like you. Both Brady and Belichick had a major part in their success. It was a team effort between them.