not a single study had ever been undertaken to measure their efficacy in stopping a pandemic. When you got right down to it, lockdowns were little more than a giant experiment.
The “there is no evidence” => “this is not true” is rapidly becoming one of my most rage-inducing things science writers use to mislead the public, and it is everywhere
In addition, he felt that the worst thing officials could do was overreact, which could create a panic.
lol, not even close. The worst thing they could do is lie about the virus’ non-existence, convince people to take dewormers instead of vaccines, and demonize masks so severely people won’t even wear them to filter smoke from forest fires.
That’s as far as I could get. We don’t have enough emotes (which is saying a lot) to carry on
The “there is no evidence” => “this is not true” is rapidly becoming one of my most rage-inducing things science writers use to mislead the public, and it is everywhere
lol, not even close. The worst thing they could do is lie about the virus’ non-existence, convince people to take dewormers instead of vaccines, and demonize masks so severely people won’t even wear them to filter smoke from forest fires.
That’s as far as I could get. We don’t have enough
emotes (which is saying a lot) to carry on
Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9NMt42il4Q
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: