• Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s partly why /r/StarTrek started it’s “be nice” rule in ~2018. It’s ok to disagree, but to just pee all over something someone liked for no reason other than the fact that they brought up that they liked it is exhausting.

    • TwoCubed@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know, I kinda like the discussions. It’s rarely really toxic, just people having strong opinions. And a lot of it is legit. I kinda like Enterprise, but there’s also a whole bunch of things that are wrong with it. A lot of these discussions end up explaining things about the lore or end up being memes.

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t really want to be toxic and I didn’t think expressing my disappointment about the show would be viewed that way. Thanks for not simply blocking me.

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was two comments about the same show. I’m sorry I don’t like your favorite tree (looking at your username) but I don’t think that makes me toxic. I actually went back and checked my comments on this community and they basically all light heartedly banter or admiration for the respective memes.

    • gnuplusmatt@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not defending negative nellies - but its is possible to enjoy something and still criticise it. You’ve attacked me in the past for having a minor criticism. I’m not going to block you over it, I just think twice about whether I want the hassle, but maybe that’s just me