• Neato@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trucks are commercial vehicles. The vast, vast majority of the US doesn’t need a truck on a daily basis. And when they do, it’s often because of their job, even if self-employed. In almost all cases pick-up trucks should be classed, and taxed, as commercial vehicles. And the exceptions have strict size restrictions.

    If you need to haul some wood, gravel or other such semi-regularly, there’s plenty of places to rent them.

    • Seleni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or maybe just make a law to reduce their size, and have any truck over a certain size be taxed?

      I like my truck. It was my grandfather’s; I inherited it after he passed away. It’s great for hauling soil or wood for my casual home improvement projects. Not having to go to all the hassle of renting some horribly-maintained junk is great.

      Of course, it’s a 2009, so not some tall coping thing. It was his farm truck.

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The article talks about hood height of 40 inches or more. My pickup is tiny compared to these american beasts but I’m pretty sure that the hood is that high even on mine.

    • halferect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it would be fine to Tax vehicles over a certain Size, my truck is a small truck so don’t lump my truck into the giants on the road. Or better yet force car manufacturers to provide smaller vehicles, its hard to find a small truck in today’s market unless you go used back to 2002

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But the reality is the opposite! Part of the reason for the death of the small truck in America is the batshit ratio of vehicle size to acceptable fuel consumption. The current “footprint” CAFE model defines the footprint of the vehicle by multiplying the vehicle’s track by wheelbase, and the MPG target is drawn like a curve on a graph such that vehicles with a larger footprint are allowed a lower fuel economy score and vise versa. So the manufacturers, who really don’t feel like designing new more efficient engines every few years to meet the requirements, can just cheat by making their vehicles bigger to qualify for a lower MPG target.

        If that scheme sounds completely asinine to you, that’s because it is. It is effectively not possible to sell a small pickup truck in America anymore unless it delivers the same gas mileage as an economy sedan – which is not going to happen. For the 2020 model year, a truck the size of an oldschool Chevy S10 would have to deliver ~39 MPG. My Crosstrek can’t even do that.

        So we get giant trucks for no reason other than to be giant instead.

        • halferect@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That is Insane and extremely depressing, I love my small truck and will keep it going as long as possible.