• _mitchejj_@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t that come down to what one defines as stable? To me LTS stable is just stagnant, but I prefer my software to be up-to-date.

    If I look at Firefox 119.01 I don’t think it less stable than Firefox 78.6.1 (ESR)

    Just how that text reads (second image) makes you think the stable tag shouldn’t exist for 22.04… Modifying something ‘out of the box’ does not seem stable when compared to something that works out of the box with updates.

    Anyway thank you for all the work you do to ensure Linux works well on Framework laptops.

    • Pythonistar@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      To me LTS stable is just stagnant

      No new features nor regressions, but bugs and security issues still get patched.

      That’s not stagnant. That’s the definition of “stable”.

    • extradudeguy@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t that come down to what one defines as stable? To me LTS stable is just stagnant, but I prefer my software to be up-to-date.

      - Firefox (snap) continues to be updated.

      - Stable in that it’s at a xx.xx.3 release state and has been thoroughly put through its paces. :)

      - We work with our partners to make sure we are able to provide the best experience possible. In this case, we use OEM C as we have patches and fixes applied to that kernel set by our partners (AMD, etc). Regressions still occur of course, but are less frequent on LTS.

      Appreciate the kind words. We are working like mad, and with a tiny team, it limits what we’d like to have done. But thankfully our partners are amazing, which helps.