“Nothing Chats, powered by Sunbird, allows you to directly message other phone users from your Nothing phone via blue bubbles.”

I don’t think this solves the problem, but it is a step in the right direction.

  • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Would not say this implementation is a step in the right direction at all. They’re logging into your Apple account through a Mac Mini.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re logging into your account with a Mac VM*

      I’m sure if it picks up any amount in of momentum, Apple will kill it, along with Beeper.

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 year ago

        The EU is currently evaluating if iMessage is considered a “gatekeeper”. Killing these services now solidifies they are gatekeepers and introduces EU regulation.

    • L3ft_F13ld!@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never owned an Apple device or dealt with iMessage chats before but my understanding is that Android users and their blue bubbles don’t have access to some of the features of iMessage and that messes with the chat for everyone or something. Also LUL Android user is too poor/not cool enough to own an iPhone. That’s what I’ve gathered from Americans on the internet anyway.

      • mayooooo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s american highschool bully culture. The rest of the planet solved this by using other messengers or simply not being cunts. Guess that approach is another thing that can’t be done in the land of the free

      • Chahk@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        This would not be a problem, but Apple purposefully and maliciously degrades the messaging experience by compressing the shit out of any MMS sent to (or received from) non-apple devices. Even non-multimedia stuff like group chats or reactions are being broken. On purpose. To piss you off just enough to maybe consider switching to their closed proprietary ecosystem.

        It may not work on you and me, but you’d be surprised how effective it is on young impressionable teens who are under extreme peer pressure by their stupid “friends” who are shallow enough to care about the chat bubble colors. My 16 y/o son was quite happy with his Pixel 5a, but was literally bullied into switching to an iphone. He spent a decent chunk of his summer job’s earnings to buy a used 12 mini and a replacement battery for it. Now he can’t sideload apps, or rearrange his home screen, or a myriad of other things that he’s gotten used to on Android, but at least his bubbles are the “right” color.

      • butter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It hurts the ability to send multi media. Specifically video just can’t be sent over MMS if you want to do more than listen.

  • people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    How far would you go to conform for something as mundane as chat bubble colors? How soulless will your life have to be to demand something like this?

    • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not about the bubbles. It’s the group chats, encryption, media size, and other rich chat features.

        • Chahk@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is true.

          But also, 99% of the population is not technical enough to download such apps and use them. They will only use the default apps that came with their phone, whatever outdated protocol they happen to be utilizing. Why else do you think Facebook, for example, pays manufacturers to preload their crapware on new handsets? And even more to make it as difficult to remove as possible.

          • people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            WhatsApp does not come pre-installed on most phones (for some reason it often isn’t included even with Facebook’s crapware). It is still the de facto chat app in India, Brazil and dozens of other Asian, South American and European countries.

            • Chahk@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              As far as I know, SMS in India and Brazil is not free. This means that for majority of users switching to a data-based app is not so much as a choice, but a necessity. In the US texting via SMS has been free for several decades, so there’s no reason for people to look for an alternative.

                • Chahk@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Exactly. It has reached critical mass to a point where if you’re not on it, you’re basically not communicating.

                  Also, I remember that cross-carrier calling was an issue, which is why most people would need to use dual-SIM phones. Not sure if it’s the same for SMS.

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Log in with your existing Apple ID username or create a new account to start sending and receiving blue bubbles.

    So I need an apple ID to use this?

    Pass.

    If you’re a Phone (2) user in one of the select countries where Nothing Chats is available, you can download the messaging app from the Google Play Store.

    So it only works in a few countries?

    Pass.

    And it only works on one OEM’s phones?

    Massive Pass.

    • GameWarrior@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I recommend getting beeper it’s similar to sunbird although it is paid but they do open source all of their back end infrastructure. Beeper is essentially just a matrix client for a bunch of different chat service bridges.

      • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Cheers for the heads up.

        beeper does look interesting but I am weary of sign up and we will tell you when you can join type apps.

        And this rings a few alarm bells for me:

        if you send a message from Beeper to a friend on WhatsApp, the message is encrypted on your Beeper client, sent to the Beeper web service, which decrypts and re-encrypts the message with WhatsApp’s proprietary encryption protocol.

        I would love for this to work but that alone has a host of issues around third party trust.

        New European legislation is coming into effect in 2024 and will force iMessage and WhatsApp to expose an interoperable end-to-end-encrypted API. Our servers are located in Europe, and we will switch to this open interface as soon as it is ready.

        Sadly, not being in the EU means I will likely pass on this but is sounds great for EU residents when the above is implemented.

  • Thalestr@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have absolutely zero confidence that Apple will allow this to exist once they get enough wind of it.

  • V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Given how aggressive Apple is in protecting their walled garden, I don’t expect this to survive the litigation. Apple tends to ignore individual hackers (look at hackintoshes) but businesses making money off unauthorized use of their APIs don’t last very long before the tidal wave of lawyers come.

    • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe, but seeing the recent scrutiny they have had for not allowing sideloading of apps, killing this might actually push legislation against it. As an android user, I wouldn’t use this app even if I had access to it because it’s not secure and because I don’t give a shit about blue bubbles.

      • V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe in the EU, but I would have little hope for the US market. The US has been astonishingly slow to take adverse action against companies within their own borders for the past 25 years. Believe me, I hope Apple and Google get what is coming to them, but I won’t hold my breath.

      • beefcat@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The company behind the feature Nothing is advertising, Sunbird, claims that their solution preserves iMessage’s end-to-end encryption. They also claim they have figured out how to handle thousands of accounts on a single Mac. Both problems Beeper hasn’t been able to solve.

        Unfortunately they have failed to provide any details about how they accomplish these things, which has Ars Technica feeling pretty skeptical about the whole endeavor.

        • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are logging with your apple ID into a Mac mini in a server farm somewhere in the world, and it acts as a relay to send you your imessages over their closed source app, that does not mean secure to me at all, even MKBHD was a little iffy about the security of this service.

  • azerial@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This makes me roll my eyes. From the Sunbird faq:

    Will the app [sunbird] be open source?

    Some of the messaging community believes that software that is open source is more secure. It is our view that it is not. The more visibility there is into the infrastructure and code, the easier it is to penetrate it. By design, open source software is distributed in nature. There is no central authority to ensure quality and maintenance and by putting that responsibility on Sunbird, development would not be feasible. Open source vulnerabilities typically stem from poorly written code that leave gaps, which attackers can use to carryout malicious activities.

    To help satisfy our own ambitious goals of providing total privacy and security, we are currently undergoing a third party audit that will validate our security, encryption and data policies and plan on receiving ISO 27001 certification after launch.

    Sure Jan.

    edit: source: https://www.sunbirdapp.com/ at the bottom

    • rho50@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The reddest of red flags.

      Open source vulnerabilities typically stem from poorly written code

      Yeah, because paid programmers never write bad closed-source code…