• shadowstripes@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d even give up the wide angle for that, who even needs that?

    Those of us who like to photograph stuff like landscapes and architecture. And it’s also super useful for video being the most stable lens and not needing to look at your phone when recording - it’s the only one I use for stuff like snowboarding.

    • ca2mt@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I’ve shot tons of reels for clients using the ultrawide as the primary lens. So who even needs it? Probably people actually using the cameras for work, also known as “pros.” Lol

      • Fotznbenutzernaml@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Alright, I take it back.

        I just have bad experiences with ultrawides, because the people in my sports club always film in ultrawide, saying “it looks better”, and it really annoys me because you end up seeing NOTHING of the subject, but instead you can see the floor and roof and 3 of the 4 walls in that gigantic hall. And on top of that, the sensor is worse now too.