E.g. abortion rights, anti-LGBTQ, contempt for atheism, Christian nationalism, etc.

  • Beemo Dinosaurierfuß@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    In short, while America needs to do SOMETHING the “Just ban guns” crowd are infuriating in their naivety.

    As someone that is firmly against the free access to guns I cannot agree that it is naivety.

    You guys got a serious problem with gun violence, your children are dying in, quite frankly, absurd numbers.
    And you keep on letting it happen for decades now.

    I am not someone that says just banning the ownership of guns outright from one second to another is the best solution there is. Off course it’s not.

    But dude, even that strawman solution that pretty much noone actually proposes would be better than your status quo.

    • redballooon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Just ban guns” is the slogan for demonstrations. Any politician who is elected for doing that will obviously need to have a better plan. Usually such plans don’t fit on a poster.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Im not American, I’m Australian. I have problems with anyone that wants to run around screaming for solutions that are impossible to implement. It might come from a good place but its just virtue signalling. That goes for people on both sides of any argument, the only thing it does is detracts from any meaningful dialogue on actual solutions.

      The gun problem in the U.S is way more cultural than financial, but even if you take all the culture and set it aside like it isnt the core of the issue even the basic numbers of doing a buyback and compensating every person and industry now out of work becomes an insane number very quickly.

    • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you want to stop children from dying, banning cars and sugary drinks would go a lot farther.

      • Beemo Dinosaurierfuß@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s such a stupid take, I am not even sure where to start responding.

        Of the many, many, many things one might reply I will just pick the simple facts that a sugary drink alone doesn’t kill anyone and cars have a real and tangible use to our society, while selling murder-tools at Walmart does not.

        And btw I am very much in favor of measures to reduce the damages caused by the sugar industry and putting strict restrictions on dangerous traffic.

        • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          So, you agree with me in the last paragraph, but called me stupid first? Get away from that reddit mentality, friend.

          Cars are not useful to society, though, they are actively harmful. They create sprawl and discourage walkability, pollute with participate as well as light and sound, and as we were discussing, are the leading cause if death for children in the US. Cars are useful only to individuals, at the expense of wider society.

          • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So, you agree with me in the last paragraph, but called me stupid first? Get away from that reddit mentality, friend.

            Cars are not useful to society, though, they are actively harmful

            Holy shit you’re not just stupid you’re straight brain-dead.