• iBaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    What can he do about it? We live in a free market society. All he can do is keep talking about it and hope the people get the message. Rebellion will start at the consumer level and go up, not the other way around. Main problem is the millions of people that rely on Fox for their news.

    • WeeSheep@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      168
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Use the anti monopoly laws we have in place to prevent price gouging from lack of competition

    • Deiv@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Damn there is nothing the government can do. Sorry guys :( You’ll just have to buy less food, and maybe then the corporations will get the hint!

      Regulations? Laws against price gauging? Naw, they can’t do that. It’s the consumers that are at fault!

      • iBaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you think Biden makes the laws? Did you fail civics class? I said nothing about enacting laws making what these companies are doing illegal, I only said Biden can’t do much about it.

        • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          He can propose laws to the legislative bramch. He might not be able to pass it himself but he could push and advocate for it

          • cole@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m sure the GOP-led house would be very receptive to that

            • conductor@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Oh what does it hurt then?

              Can’t say anything, because of the GOP.

              Super cool having a democrat president who’s got no balls. Can’t offend the house.

              • prole@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                What does it hurt? Political capital, for one.

                Also, you don’t just say, “let’s make a law about X”, and a 3,000 page bill just appears in front of you. That shit takes TONS of work. Biden can’t just materialize a workable plan that both parties (in this political climate? lol) will ever agree on.

                That just isn’t how this country works. If you want this to change, Congress has to change it.

                • rambaroo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I love how “political capital” is the neolibs go-to excuse for why the working class can’t be helped. Yet there’s a never ending amount of “political capital” I help giant corporations make more money. Fucking tools

                  • prole@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    What? Do you think I like that political capital is a thing? It’s fucking gross. I am just acknowledging reality. What do you think the President actually does in the US?

                    Like, do you even realize that you’re advocating for authoritarianism? Or is it OK, as long as it’s the person doing the things you want? And we all know situations like that are super sustainable…

                  • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    “The president of the United States cannot unilaterally implement price controls on goods without the involvement of Congress. Price controls typically involve changes to laws and regulations, which fall under the legislative branch’s authority. Congress would need to pass legislation granting such powers or specifically authorizing the president to implement price controls in certain circumstances.”

                    I hope you direct all that useless anger you have here on the internet for voting time, then.

                    We just had local elections here nationally in the U.S., whom did you place your vote for to solve this issue?

    • graymess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Price controls are well within the president’s powers. It’s not that radical of a concept.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s within congress’s powers for sure. I don’t think the president. Congress has done it in the past though, so they for sure can again.

      • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why is this upvoted?

        No, the president of the United States cannot unilaterally implement price controls on goods without the involvement of Congress. Price controls typically involve changes to laws and regulations, which fall under the legislative branch’s authority. Congress would need to pass legislation granting such powers or specifically authorizing the president to implement price controls in certain circumstances.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Price controls are an extremely radical concept, themselves. Last thing this economy needs is further distortion.

        The sucky thing about inflation is you have to run through it like an illness.

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Windfall taxes. Let them share their gains, that’s the whole point of taxes since society don’t work otherwise.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s vastly different from a direct price control, in both intent and effect.

            I’d love to pass lots more taxes but with the current House that’s completely impossible

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Do you know basic US Civics, or…? Biden has the bully pulpit (basically what he’s doing here), and that’s pretty much it. He can issue executive orders (and has in the past about this), but those are often complete bullshit that’s unenforceable, and will be removed by the next person in the office.

        Take a look at Trump rolling back Obama’s EPA purview over waterways in the US for a recent example that has left over 60% of our nation’s waterways now unprotected.

      • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you want a dictatorship or something? Congress writes laws, talk to your members of congress.