ickplant@lemmy.world to Lord of the memesEnglish · 1 year agoWell, that's just like, your opinion, manlemmy.worldimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1467arrow-down117
arrow-up1450arrow-down1imageWell, that's just like, your opinion, manlemmy.worldickplant@lemmy.world to Lord of the memesEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-squareDroneRights [it/its]@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down14·1 year agoMaybe the author is just really upset and feels the need to be mean about it. I don’t see the need to be mean back, condescension in an article never hurt anyone.
minus-squareThe Assman@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoIt’s literally rage bait
minus-squareDroneRights [it/its]@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down8·edit-21 year agoI don’t believe rage bait is this common. There’s no evidence for this conspiracy theory that the author is hiding anything.
minus-squareCeruleanRuin@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoWhy else would he be writing about a movie that came out twenty years ago? Might as well write an article about how shitty you think Lawrence of Arabia is.
minus-squareDroneRights [it/its]@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoWe are on a sublemmy devoted to a 20 year old movie. People still watch LOTR.
Maybe the author is just really upset and feels the need to be mean about it. I don’t see the need to be mean back, condescension in an article never hurt anyone.
It’s literally rage bait
I don’t believe rage bait is this common. There’s no evidence for this conspiracy theory that the author is hiding anything.
Why else would he be writing about a movie that came out twenty years ago?
Might as well write an article about how shitty you think Lawrence of Arabia is.
We are on a sublemmy devoted to a 20 year old movie. People still watch LOTR.