Living in mixed reality is cool, but you’re still walking around with silly digital ski goggles on your face. And how cool is that?
  • pax@sh.itjust.works
    0·
    2 years ago

    if this headset will help you find objects in real life, yeah. I am blind, so this tech, if accessible enough, could revolutionize how I recognize and interact with people.

    • im stuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      0·
      2 years ago

      smartphone consumption

      Smartphones Georg, who lives in cave & eats over 10,000 smartphones each day, is an outlier adn should not have been counted

    • M500@lemmy.mlEnglish
      0·
      2 years ago

      It wouldn’t be bad if it were more of a computer replacement. Than a smart phone replacement. Today, I was extremely cramped with screen space and this headset would have been great! But I’ll just buy a bigger desk and a laptop stand for like 5% the cost.

  • FaceDeer@lemmy.ml
    0·
    2 years ago

    If the technology was to become widespread it would have to do better than “silly digital ski goggles” anyway. I wear glasses, I wouldn’t mind slightly bulkier glasses if in exchange I can get a heads-up display telling me what the name of that person who’s greeting me that I should totally know the name of but have forgotten right now.

    • maxprime@lemmy.mlEnglish
      0·
      2 years ago

      I’m the other way on this one. The idea of having an always-on HUD, while convenient, seems far more dystopian than a nifty toy to watch immersive movies on and play interesting games on when I get home. I know it’s an unpopular opinion around here, but I for one am excited to see computing take on different HIDs. The thought of an infinitely large canvas to compute on appeals to me, while an always-with-me wearable does not.

      I like having a disproportionately powerful computing device at home. When I’m out, I’ll bring my analogue watch and an outdated smartphone to text people and read articles. When I’m computing, I go all out. When I’m not, I’m not.

  • M500@lemmy.ml
    0·
    2 years ago

    I really don’t. I wear glasses and I can’t imagine a system where it’s comfortable to wear both. If my glasses could be replaced by “smart” glasses, then I’d give it a go, but not if they are going to basically be a headset that looks like glasses.

    • Hayato38@lemmy.ml
      0·
      2 years ago

      I heard on TechLinked that they charge you more if you wear glasses for your prescription to be in the lenses or something.

  • gzrrt@feddit.de
    0·
    2 years ago

    No. The future of tech should be about getting more capabilities out of fewer (and/or less intrusive) screens. Would love to see more advances in e-ink displays and open-source, ‘ambient’ voice-controlled UIs.

      • gzrrt@feddit.de
        0·
        2 years ago

        I don’t see any downside at all if it’s layered on top of some other (very capable) keyboard-driven UI that can do all the same things.

        • pineapple@lemmy.pineapplemachine.com
          0·
          2 years ago

          I don’t see any downside at all if it’s layered on top of some other (very capable) keyboard-driven UI that can do all the same things.

          The downside is that no existing tech company has enough self-control to actually keep these kinds of recordings private.

            • The Doctor@lemmy.ml
              0·
              2 years ago

              Several such solutions already exist. Problem is, only folks like us mess around with it. Non-geeks, not so much.

            • Kelson's Sorta Old Account@wandering.shop
              0·
              2 years ago

              @gzrrt @pineapple Yeah - ideally, any voice control processing or recordings should never leave the device it’s used on. At worst, the local network.

              It’s so annoying that the tech for voice recognition became usable before mobile processing power caught up but after mobile bandwidth was enough to offload the processing to someone else’s computer.

        • pax@sh.itjust.works
          0·
          2 years ago

          there doesn’t need to be a keyboard. just good hand gestures which can’t be performed by accident, and good face recognition software. if apple headset will have this, I’m gonna bankrupt.

          • gzrrt@feddit.de
            0·
            2 years ago

            Don’t think anything can actually replace the power and expressiveness of keyboards and text interfaces- that’s always going to be the bottom layer for a productive setup (i.e., you need to actually be able to write code, write shell scripts etc to control your machine, etc).

            Guess what I really want is just some kind of Unix machine that hums along 24/7 in the background, with many different paradigms for interacting with it when you don’t have (or want) a standard keyboard and display. Putting a display over my face feels like a giant leap in the wrong direction

          • The Doctor@lemmy.ml
            0·
            2 years ago

            I got to try messing around with a Hololens a couple of years back. The hand tracking wasn’t perfect but it was pretty cool. It read my “typing in the air” gestures to set a WPA2 key very accurately (much to my surprise). The parameters of the demo I was playing around in (picking up and moving virtual packages around in a model city to control drones flying around that part of the convention center) was pretty cool.

      • 0x1C3B00DA@lemmy.ml
        0·
        2 years ago

        Agreed. I don’t want to use voice controls for anything but I agree with the OPs more general point of getting more capabilities out of fewer screens

  • backpackn@lemmy.ml
    0·
    2 years ago

    Headsets already feel outdated. They seem inconvenient, uncomfortable, and take you away from life instead of enhancing it. Whatever happened to google glass? I disliked that for many reasons but at least it wasn’t a headset.

    • The Doctor@lemmy.ml
      0·
      2 years ago

      Google happened to it. Right when some of us started doing practical things with it. Still haven’t forgiven them for that.

        • The Doctor@lemmy.ml
          0·
          2 years ago

          I still don’t think I should have told them I was working on a software prosthetic for it.

            • The Doctor@lemmy.ml
              0·
              2 years ago

              I was writing code for Google Glass that implemented facial recognition. A friend of mine suffered a TBI in an automobile wreck and developed partial facial prosopagnosia as a result. I was basically writing software that would recognize faces within 15 feet of the wearer and compare it to images of their contacts in their Google account, and would throw up an AR subtitle identifying the person on a match. Not too long after I filed the developer applications and outlined my project, the Glass project flatlined.

  • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
    0·
    2 years ago

    The Apple headset does look a lot more lightweight and comfortable than most of what we have today - but even then, I just don’t see it.

    Even if they got it down to the weight and bulk of actual ski goggles, that wouldn’t actually be comfortable for long sessions compared to sitting at a computer or watching TV (or even using a smart phone)

    And ultimately you have to ask what the actual benefit is. The VR/AR industry seems (baffingly) to be moving away from games and towards social/business use cases (the Apple headset baffingly seems to be mosty selling itself as a laptop replacement). Everything we saw them doing with the Apple headset in the demo would be more comfortable and easier to do via more traditional mediums.

    And don’t even get me started on Meta who wants us to start working and shopping in VR…

    VR has amazing potential for games, but it seems like just when we started to realize that potential with HL:A, the industry just gave up on it. Now-a-days, all the new titles are arcade games optimized for the quest, and hardware developers seem hell-bent on selling these headsets for everything except games.

    I could see wanting something like what the Google Glass was supposed to be as a “wear everywhere” headset, but even then it’d be a niche thing for tech enthusiasts

  • Lilium@lemmy.ml
    0·
    2 years ago

    That’s why when Google revealed the Glasses I thought “that’s it, that’s the headwear device that will be the future, it’s literally just glasses!”.

    Alas, I should have known back then there was one thing going against that device’s survival odds: it was a project from project slayer, Google.

  • elouboub@kbin.social
    0·
    2 years ago

    I love how everybody’s shitting on it now, but I bet you that this started a bunch of copycats that’ll offer it at 1500 or more. Everyone laughed at “phones without jacks” and now even FairPhone released a model without jacks. FairPhone basically said: yeah, let’s go with a trend to add more e-waste and say we’re for the planet.

    • weebs@lemmy.ml
      0·
      2 years ago

      Fwiw I still buy phones based on the headphone jack

      I’m a tech hipster and direct audio is flat out, tight, my humans

      Although I’m perfectly willing to admit cordless is better for most people’s use cases and I do own a pair of wireless headphones for that reason

      • gzrrt@feddit.de
        0·
        2 years ago

        Same here (even though I own bluetooth headphones). No reason phones can’t support both

  • アルケミー船長@lemmy.one
    0·
    2 years ago

    For all the faults Google glass had, at least they were similar in size to regular glasses. I would only consider these things if they were as non-intrusive as possible, aka not ski goggles