• SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why should anyone get to own the only effective avenues of communication? Communication is what determines how the world works.

    Who currently owns the “only effective avenues of communication”?

    CP is illegal obviously, and jihad doesn’t make sense in the cute cats category the way ‘straight only game mod’ makes sense in the ‘game mod’ category.

    “Sometimes you gotta put up with some ugly if you don’t want people silenced for their perspective.” Seems there’s a limit to the ugly you’re willing to put up with, and you’re quite willing to silence perspectives yourself.

    You cleaely still want people to moderate social networks. I assume you’d want these people to outside the company?

    • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hell, we’re on a site where you can literally filter what content you see. No one is so pro communication that they’ll happily chat away to someone that they don’t want to be around.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The line should be drawn at actual harm of course. That can also be indirect.

      • SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ah, so you’re pro moderation when you personally find the contect to be even indirectly harmful.

        “Double standards are bad, no matter which side.”