At the moment the internet is flawed, do you think the fediverse is the solution?

  • PhillyCodeHound@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think you’re on to something. I’m all in on the Fediverse. I still have some legacy stuff on traditional social, but I spend most of my time here. Though I have to admit I love me some LinkedIn.

  • casey@lemmy.wiuf.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think ultimately that is going to be the goal. Security advocates for years have insisted that we OWN our own data.

  • Phantom_Engineer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Long term, the Fediverse is the way forward, but social media has staying power even if it dimishes from what it was. It will ages before the Fediverse replaces centralized social media, but I think it will slowly happen.

    • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I saw a comparison here between the Fediverse and other federated services like emails and POTS. I think there are a lot of similarities, but if that’s true, the Fediverse still has a long way to go before it matures like traditional federated services like email. Things like spamlists and increased interoperability will be needed eventually.

      At least in the short-term, I think Lemmy has a good base here to take over from Reddit, and the increased focus will help the Fediverse mature further. Lemmy won’t be another Voat.

      • Phantom_Engineer@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Oh yeah, definitely not. FOSS combined with federation means that even if the main instance and dev team are toast, someone else could pick up where they left off and run with it. Lemmy doesn’t necessarily need Lemmy.ml to function, which you couldn’t say about voat (or Reddit, for that matter.)

  • tookmyname@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    No. And that’s fine. I don’t expect underground music to replace top 40. And there’s a place for both.

  • Wizzy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    IMHO these are fundamentally different concepts. Popular social media is made popular by pushing curated ‘engaging’ content, rather than organic content, to monetize gullible users. It has become an entertainment venue, giving their audience a steady stream of what they want them to see, even if by force. Popular “Social Media” has rapidly devolved into a real-life MST3K. Users feel betrayed that the sites no longer feel like the social experience/experiment they wanted… but are users really wanting to leave, or just switch to voice outrage?

    Alternatively, the fediverse doesn’t appeal to those wanting force fed entertainment, or seeking viral fame amongst family/friends, and outraged users will complain it doesn’t function like so-and-so site, or work ‘their way’. It is more technical and takes more proactive actions to engage with others, which is a positive thing.

    Users think they can switch from Coke to Pepsi, but the fediverse is more of a mixed drink with some extra bourbon.

    Could it / should it replace popular social media? Probably not, unless more mindsets change over what a social media experience should be… but it can fill a growing gap as this happens (which will in-turn improve features & development).

    • Umbrias@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I would say, if in theory a social media achieved a small community, informative and positive culture which avoided spreading misinformation or cultivating harmful stereotypes of those they disagree with via the mechanisms of that social media, that it should be more standardized and more widely accepted. Largely because that is just more healthy in general. Not that Lemmy will necessarily be that in practice in the long run.

    • BurningnnTree@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Great insight. I agree that the fediverse will never be anywhere near as big as mainstream social media, but I’m hoping it will continue to grow and be recognized as a valid alternative.

      Personally I think of the fediverse as like diet social media. Just like how people switch from Coke to Diet Coke to avoid sugar, people can switch from Twitter to Mastodon to avoid recommendation algorithms and overly-stimulating content. At least that’s why I joined the fediverse. I know most people love algorithms and endless content (hence why Tik Tok is so huge) but for those of us who want something less stimulating, I’m glad that the fediverse exists as an alternative. As long as the fediverse is big enough to be enjoyable, but not so big that it becomes super addictive, that’s good enough for me.

    • jursed@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      yeah I definetly agree. specifically because of the lack of algorithms or profit motives it won’t be " addictive " nor as easy as traditional social media to find what I’m most likely to engage in. but it also means ragebait is less likely to be pushed to me, and for that, its actually quite fine…

      im quite sick of the “few big websites” that the internet has become. I miss when there were a greater variety of forums, blogs and places to hang out, only supported through people’s passions. and it seems to me federation goes back to those old times.

    • kiwi@kale.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thanks for this insightful post. I agree that the fediverse feels different and that’s ok. It’s exciting to get the chance to build something new and be a part of it starting.

    • Umbrias@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      People said that about reddit, I don’t think Lemmy is anywhere near being too complex for the average user. More that social medias generally favor simplicity because simplicity is easy to control, modify, and generally nudge from a developer side trying to guarantee a very specific use case that generates money, rather than just naturally occurring social systems.

      Let’s be real, humans have been dealing with social networks far more complex, systems more complex, for almost all of human history. The sheer volume of people, no, but the actual processes of interaction, yes.

    • Rick@thesimplecorner.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I agree. It’s been fun and challenging to learn even just as a user. I work in tech and it is a lot of concepts to grasp and understand. So much potential though!

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      “Servers? Instances? Is this a place to connect with my friends or a goddamn server room?”

      That’s not a property of of federation (see email and websites) it’s just because early adopters are a little wired. In any new social phenomenon, it takes a second wave of adopters (first wave of followers) to bridge the wierdos from the masses.

      Cue this classic study in leadership: https://youtu.be/hO8MwBZl-Vc be the first one to follow the wierdos and show the masses it’s cool.

    • gredo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      But couldn’t it be made easier? Who cares which server a community or a user is registered on. I register where a friend sent me the link to and from there on it shouldn’t matter and could be handled in the background.

      The big sites are also not one central instance. They have several distributed instances all managed by the same company.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Future instance owners and moderators don’t want users and communities to be able to migrate seamlessly. Mastodon has the same fatal flaw. They want to keep your history and relationships hostage so you can’t leave. This is the only thing turns signup to Lemmy and Mastodon into an important decision you don’t want to get wrong. That’s why you have to read and read and read before signing up and be a Lemmy expert before choosing the right instance for you.

        Of course by this time 99% of users have gone back to Reddit. And the 1% that stays still feels like a huge wave.

        Also many elitists are happy signup is clunky, it filters out the rif raf and the common Joe. It creates an exclusive space where everyone uses Linux, loves anime and don’t like sports.

        A place with no cultural relevance ree from eternal September.

        • KelsonV Old Account@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Mastodon has the same fatal flaw. They want to keep your history and relationships hostage so you can’t leave.

          You can migrate your relationships to a new Mastodon server.

          And while you can’t directly transfer the history (the debate over how/whether to do this has gone on for literally years), you can export an archive you can keep locally, and there are tools out there to parse it and convert it to some other form (static website, whatever). Someone’s probably written an importer by now, though I’d have to look.

        • gredo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Well there’s also techies who don’t (only) use Linux and like (some) sports. More of a Sci-Fi and Comic Book guy than anime here.

          Let’s see how this grows.

        • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Future instance owners and moderators don’t want users and communities to be able to migrate seamlessly. Mastodon has the same fatal flaw

          This is misrepresentative for a few ways.

          For one, you can in fact migrate your mastadon account, fairly easily in fact.

          For another thing, instance owners and moderators don’t really get to choose whether migration is possible, the code contributors do. I suppose instance owners could start forking their own version of lemmy to make that harder, but ultimately there will always be folks willing to host the “best” version, and so people will just leave

    • To some extent this is a feature, not a problem though. I know it’s elitist, but in a lot of ways the internet was a much nicer place when it was just a bunch of tech nerds.

  • lo puto zirak@lemmy.cat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    as popular social media is getting crap the fediverse will grow on users and content

    a replacement is a very long term action that involves not only the users so nowadays: no maybe in a far future

  • Mir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    In the sense that it would take over facebook or instagram? No, not a chance.

  • Maru@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The issue is that without marketing or any big scale advertising, the fediverse is never going to take off. Because it is not backed by a big corporation with enough capital like Reddit, it won’t ever reach the masses, even with all the advertising the recent Reddit API changes have brought to lemmy and the fediverse, even if Fedi were to be 10x better than anything else.

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Any instance starting to use ads would likely lose a lot of users. We don’t want to look at ads, they are everywhere and they are poison.

      I could see a small membership fee as being more acceptable, like a dollar per month. It’s not a big deal for a lot of people. But we are not there yet.

    • @retreat3926 @Bicyclejohn If that really is the case, then there needs to be a happy medium between intrusive ads that uglify a UI and spammy nonsense that plagues corporate social media. But even then, a lot of people came here to get away from corpo spam, and will not take kindly or lightly to ads suddenly appearing on their feeds (and some instances have and will outright ban it)

      • Maru@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        You mean, to get the money to actually advertise the Fediverse? Or to advertise IN the fediverse?

  • pistachio@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The federation aspect of it has to be invisible to the user. The user shouldn’t have to pick an instance (unless they want to) and they should see communities from all instances by default. Also we need a discovery algorithm. That’s the most needed feature.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Before we had the fediverse - long before it - we had Usenet: people conversing globally in email-shaped units. It was shared and synched.

    It was awesome. Questions answered, points debated, everything you wanted.

    I don’t think the fediverse is a magical solution, but it does have a familiar feel to it. Not as good when it comes to spelling, but “it’s just the web,” so the rules are maybe different.

    This is fine.

  • ultra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Probably, since it’s decentralised people can just move to another instance if the mods on theirs abuse their power.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you move you lose your history and relationships behind. There is no migration, same as Mastodon. On purpose so as not to disempower instance owners

      • laxe@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        It works be nice if there was a way to verify that a user is the same one across Lemmy instances.

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          That is one of the main function of public key cryptography

          You can append your digital signature to your messages and it becomes possible to confirm the same person made all the messages

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s an open source project. Anybody can fork it and create a separate and incompatible network. What they’re is, is lack of interest in allowing frictionless for the users. Which would streamline onboarding.

          https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/12423

          This long standing issue, which has been closed before, most be completed before the users can sign-up without worry what their instance owners thinks.

  • nrab@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think it could, and I also think it won’t and that it will stay in the relative niche. But that’s a good thing. So it replaces all social media for me but doesn’t bring the general public. Win-win situation