An overview of studies which investigate correlations between morality and religious vs. secular / atheist ideologies presented by Phil Zuckerman who is a professor of sociology and secular studies at the Claremont colleges in California, USA. Summary: Atheists / secular people not only have morals but are even more moral than religious people. Note: Of course moral is a matter of perspective. In this context we agree that compassion and empathy are our foundations of moral.

Crosspost from !atheism@feddit.de.

An overview of studies which investigate correlations between morality and religious vs. secular / atheist ideologies presented by Phil Zuckerman who is a professor of sociology and secular studies at the Claremont colleges in California, USA.

Summary: Atheists / secular people not only have morals but are even more moral than religious people.

Note: Of course moral is a matter of perspective. In this context we agree that compassion and empathy are our foundations of moral.

  • jasory@programming.devEnglish
    14·
    7 months ago

    There is nothing to clarify, especially since you never even specified what confused you.

    “It does make me uninclined to talk to you further”

    Oh no, what shall I do?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      7 months ago

      Everything you say confuses me, starting with you having some issue with me pasting a quote. Why do you even give a shit? If you don’t like what I post, just block me.

      • jasory@programming.devEnglish
        12·
        7 months ago

        “Why do you even give a shit”

        Why did you post it? My reason for posting a criticism is atleast as valid as yours for posting the initial comment. The primary difference is that my clearly satirical fake quote wasn’t deliberately conveying a false statement.

        “Just block me”

        Please people, don’t criticise me!

        If you announce something to the public, the public can respond back. The world isn’t a pulpit to preach from.

          • jasory@programming.devEnglish
            12·
            7 months ago

            I characterised my statement as a fake quote, you illiterate dolt, “fake” is literally directly after "my " and before “quote”. It was satirizing your quote-mining of a clearly false statement, by attributing another clearly false statement to a noted logician and pretending that it was therefore correct, because that’s exactly what you did.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              7 months ago

              Huh. So maybe I’m not the genius you claimed I think I am and actually the idiot I think I am.

              Can you imagine? You not being right about me?

              • jasory@programming.devEnglish
                12·
                7 months ago

                Yes, I can imagine. You are probably somewhat self-aware that you are a moron. That’s why you commit an appeal to authority fallacy in your initial comment.

                But keep on imaging that you can play epistemic games with me.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  1·
                  7 months ago

                  Somewhat? I literally said I’m an idiot. Where is the somewhat? How much more direct do I have to be?