• rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you mean something else please let me know.

    Yes, I meant what I wrote.

    That you have to encourage circulation and discourage “hoarding”, which means that the former should be much more beneficial than the latter. For “the rich” as well.

    “Tax breaks” are selective bullshit which shouldn’t ever happen.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well then you’re just plain wrong. Because we’ve been lowering taxes on the wealthy for 60 years and they still aren’t circulating the money. We even tried giving them money. Just more yachts and stocks.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        See, it won’t make a difference if I repeat what I said for the third time. You are just not getting it just as you are not getting economics.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The actual history - yes, it doesn’t. The subjective picture in your head or mine - of course it does. And naturally I prefer my subjective picture, especially since you refused to read its description, arguing with your imagination instead.

            Nobody fscking cares what you say to another person when it includes “you think this, and not what you are saying you think”, it’s nuts.