“The rich gazed at their superyachts, and decided they were not enough. The new breed of megayachts, which are at least 70 metres (230ft) in length, may be the most expensive moveable assets ever created.”

“First and foremost, owning a megayacht is the most polluting activity a single person can possibly engage in. Abramovich’s yachts emit more than 22,000 tonnes of carbon every year, which is more than some small countries. Even flying long-haul every day of the year, or air-conditioning a sprawling palace, would not get close to those emissions levels.

The bulk of these emissions happen whether or not a yacht actually travels anywhere. Simply owning one – or indeed building one – is an act of enormous climate vandalism.”

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see it as self-sorting, with no need to ban them. Eventually, most of the world is either going to be climate migrants or impacted by climate migration or impacted by climate change in some other way, likely all three. Some of those impacted people might be really resentful about it. Some of those resentful people might see wealthy executives and oil companies as personally accountable. It probably won’t take long for the wealthy to wise up and voluntarily give them up once it becomes clear what an acme bullseye they really are.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It probably won’t take long for the wealthy to wise up and voluntarily give them up once it becomes clear what an acme bullseye they really are.

      I don’t believe this, simply because the rich have also been busy buying and building mega secure doomsday bunkers.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was going to sarcastically ask if they’re going to move their yachts into their bunkers, but then realized I don’t want to know the answer.