CDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 11 months agoYour thoughts?sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1145arrow-down11
arrow-up1144arrow-down1imageYour thoughts?sh.itjust.worksCDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squaremnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·11 months agoIsn’t urban combat the environment where tanks are the most poorly suited?
minus-squarecorrupts_absolutely@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-211 months agopretty sure theyd be worse in space
minus-squareDroechai@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·11 months agoI’ve heard that submarines win vs tanks in all engagements at 120 meter below sea
minus-squarecorrupts_absolutely@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareanton@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoSubmarines would also outperform tanks in space. Randall Moore (xkcd author) wants to remind everyone turning the missiles around for maneuvering to remove the warheads. Can’t link the xkcd because it’s in a physical book.
Isn’t urban combat the environment where tanks are the most poorly suited?
pretty sure theyd be worse in space
I’ve heard that submarines win vs tanks in all engagements at 120 meter below sea
deleted by creator
Submarines would also outperform tanks in space.
Randall Moore (xkcd author) wants to remind everyone turning the missiles around for maneuvering to remove the warheads. Can’t link the xkcd because it’s in a physical book.