• lps@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Glad to hear it, now re-invest it into public services like healthcare and transit where it’s sorely needed.

    • TemporaryBoyfriend@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      … and education, infrastructure, social programs, addiction treatment, low income housing, etc…

      …but instead it’s being hoarded to be transferred to private companies and individuals.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      For this government, cutting funding in health, education, social services and infrastructure is intended to make them all fail so that privatization is the only answer. It’s not some kind of accident or unexpected surplus. They are starving us.

    • CrowdScene@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well it’s not great. That $22.6 billion comes from not committing funding to any one thing and sticking it in a contingency fund. Since those funds aren’t earmarked for any particular program services that rely on government funding have difficulties planning for the long term when funding relies on the largesse of the government in any particular year and those generous gifts can be taken away and bestowed to somebody else in the next calendar year. It makes programs reliant on being in the government’s good graces and hopeful that funding their program advances the government’s goals, much like nobles of old backstabbing each other to stay in a monarch’s good graces.

  • deelayman@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    With bill 124 scrapped, the public service unions are using their contract reopener clauses to negotiate retroactive wage increases. That should make a dent!

  • outbound@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No no no… it won’t be used on programs or debt. It’ll be used to reward those supporters of the duly-elected government who graciously contributed vast amounts of money to the election campaign. All together now: Huzzah to the lobbiests!!