• FMT99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s bizarre that the identification documents your government wants you to have are not covered by your taxes.

    • TheHolm@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      you do not need passport inside Australia. But in other hand you still paying for driver licence/photo id.

      • Nath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Much of that cost is third party insurance, though. If you are in an accident and someone is hurt, the government will cover their rehabilitation. Or yours, I guess if you are the one hurt.

        I expect that much of the cost of a passport funds the embassies and consulates around the world. At least in theory.

      • Marin_Rider@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        technically you could probably get away without those either. I’m actually unsure of the law there but I’m not sure its compulsory to own one of those IDs? would make buying booze hard though without if your younger

      • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s largely because the states handle both transport and policing.

        And we don’t pay taxes directly to the state governments - only stamp duties. /s