• tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This article is utterly devoid of details. I hope to hear more about this soon.

    Edit: apparently I did not read the whole thing. I stopped when I got to this:

    "To continue reading, log in or subscribe.”

    • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      11 months ago

      Cop ran red light, swerved across two lane and hit the gay bar. Then they went after the owner and trumped up an assault charge when witnesses say there was no assault. Oh and first they tried to say they were swerving to miss a dog, then to miss a parked car.

      I think that’s about the jist of it.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      I read another article with more detail, unfortunately it was a police statement, so you know for a fact it’s mostly lies.

      They claim he attacked the cops when they crashed through his business, which I don’t buy for a second. More likely he got rightly pissed, bitched out the cops and they didn’t like being yelled at and arrested him.

      • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        All of that is in the original article, I’m not sure what you guys are seeing.

        Edit: Apparently it’s paywalled for some people? No idea why it’s not for me.

    • beerclue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s a lot of detail there… Did you go all the way down? Anyway, that’s messed up!

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      … Did you just stop at the title?

      There’s like 25 paragraphs detailing the whole situation. Only thing really missing is the footage NYT supposedly saw.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        There’s like 25 paragraphs detailing the whole situation.

        No there isn’t. There is only a whiny message bitching at me to turn off private browsing mode and subscribe. An article that refuses to display doesn’t count as an article.