Similar to the recent question about artists where you can successfully separate them from their art. Are there any artists who did something so horrible, so despicable, that it has instantly invalidated all art that they have had any part in?

  • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The popularity of art can both increase it’s value and promote the creator, making their other works more valuable.

    • Kalash@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Potentially, sure. But that also doesn’t apply if you’re enjoying it in private.

      • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Privately inside your own head or from a book you already owned that you then proceed to never discuss, sure. But views, downloads (even pirated), word of mouth, all help promote the work.

        • Kalash@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What about when the artistis is dead and can no longer profit of his work by any means? Does that make the art “ok” again?

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            We work really hard to deprive ourselves of our own culture. From 90 year copyrights, to allowing all this geolocking multiple streaming services, to digital text, and to self-censorship.

            Is anyone going to claim that they are a better person because they never read Harry Potter? No, I don’t support her bigotry I just don’t know what we gain out of having less culture.

            • Kalash@feddit.ch
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I totally agree. Ignoring the positive contributions from bad people just makes for an overall worse world.

              My best practice is basically to try to ignore as much “celebrity news” as possible. Last I heard was that was “too woke” for making dumbledore gay, even there was nothing about it in the books. No idea what she did now to be a biggot … and I don’t really care.

              They were great books and decent movies and her actions outside the fictional world won’t change that.

          • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think for a great many artists being remembered after their death is a significant part of making art. So if the artist like tried real real hard to remain in obscurity but was nevertheless discovered (a reverse-Van-Gogh if you will) then maybe.

            Unrelated by I also think the artist, what they experienced, how and why they made it, are all implicitly part of the work.