jezebelley3d@lemmy.zip to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoLemmy MAUs climbing back up! You love to see it.lemmy.zipimagemessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up1601arrow-down110
arrow-up1591arrow-down1imageLemmy MAUs climbing back up! You love to see it.lemmy.zipjezebelley3d@lemmy.zip to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square114fedilink
minus-squareoce 🐆@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·11 months ago2% of active users vs 18% for Mastodon though. I’m impressed by Mastodon’s percentage, how comes?
minus-squarerglullis@communick.newslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down3·edit-211 months agoalien.top has registered 1.18M users, but pretty much all of them are (still) bots and not count as active. Servers that mirror Twitter users (like bird.makeup) don’t inflate Mastodon user count because it reports itself as a different software.
minus-squareCrayonMasterlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoWhere did those numbers come from? MAU/users ismore like 25%?
minus-squareoce 🐆@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-211 months ago1.7/9.6 = 0.18 0.05/2.1 = 0.02
minus-squareCrayonMasterlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoOh you’re right, I read that as 490,000, sorry. Thanks
2% of active users vs 18% for Mastodon though. I’m impressed by Mastodon’s percentage, how comes?
alien.top has registered 1.18M users, but pretty much all of them are (still) bots and not count as active.
Servers that mirror Twitter users (like bird.makeup) don’t inflate Mastodon user count because it reports itself as a different software.
Where did those numbers come from? MAU/users ismore like 25%?
From the image in op.
OK, but what arithmetic?
1.7/9.6 = 0.18
0.05/2.1 = 0.02
Oh you’re right, I read that as 490,000, sorry. Thanks