• TheYang@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    They advertise themselves as a safe space.

    being safe and being open are somewhat detrimental to each other.
    They choose to be less open, to be more safe.

    Fine by me, but I’d expect them to turn into a LGBTQIA+ (is that the current one?) echo chamber before long.
    And maybe I’ll be wrong, and that’ll be fine too.

      • VerifiablyMrWonka@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        LGBTQIA+ (is that the current one?)

        It’s somewhat ironic that this is just the sort of statement that beehaw admins are fed up of moderating away.

        • zalack@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I’ve definitely noticed a running set of themes in the posts that are most critical of this move and it’s making me much more sympathetic to Beehaw’s decision.

          • Kichae@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Assholes don’t like being told they’re not invited to the party. And the reasons they’re not invited are… Well, things start to get recursive at this point.

    • gk99@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Funny to me that people like you always complain about “safe spaces” in the same breath that you make it clear you can’t handle something as irrelevant to you as someone’s sexuality. That’s projecting fragility. These aren’t “safe spaces,” they’re just only allowing decent people who don’t flip their shit when they find out what two consenting adults want to do with their bodies.