• The_v@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Chickens do not receive any hormones. It’s been banned in poultry in the U.S. since the 1950’s when it was tested and shown to be ineffective. Beef commonly gets hormone implants in their ears. No hormones are approved or used in feed.

    The rapid growth of the birds is mostly due to selective breeding and nutritional improvements. The growth rate and adult size in animals can be massively changed by breeders. Just look at the Great Dane and mini-yorky in dogs.

    They also use antibiotics in the feed to reduce the bacteria load of the birds. This does increase the growth rate and reduces sick birds and deaths. It is not a good idea when it comes to antibiotic resistance buildup in bacteria however.

    • Electromechanical_Supergiant@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      For any Canadians reading this, adding hormones or steroids to meat and dairy animals has always been prohibited here for all types of livestock.

      Antibiotics are allowed on sick cows and pigs but they can’t be used for dairy or meat until they’ve been off the antibiotics for a period of time that is supposed to be long enough to flush it from their system. Chickens are too short lived and antibiotics are prohibited if they are to be sold for human consumption.

      You know how A&W advertises that their beef is free of added hormones and steroids? Well that’s actually true for all meat sold in Canada. A&W is just the only one advertising it. Pretty clever as campaign, actually.

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Coincidentally, this also blocks most of the importation of chicken and beef from the U.S. giving their domestic producers an almost exclusive market.

        A happy little accident I guess.

        • Electromechanical_Supergiant@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There are a lot of reasons to shit on the beef and dairy cartels in Canada, and they have definitely captured the market with regulation, but I don’t believe this is an example of that. I think this is a good safety regulation that actually is in the interest of average Canadians for once.

          • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s what regulations are supposed to do, and the very large network of regulations working within and across industries are nearly invisible to the public because they’re beneficial. Some regulations were put in place to serve malicious actors at the expense of the public, but they’re not the norm, and many do get repealed when more people become aware of their damage.

            This seems like a good example of regulations improving the system, which also had beneficial knock-on effects.

    • K[r]ukenberg@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They also use antibiotics in the feed […] It is not a good idea

      It’s a fucking collision course with reality doomed to send us back to the 19th century.

      But of course, for a short duration of human history, it marginally increased the profits for stakeholders.