sunnie@lemmy.ca to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 11 months agono.. just nolemmy.caimagemessage-square91fedilinkarrow-up1553arrow-down118
arrow-up1535arrow-down1imageno.. just nolemmy.casunnie@lemmy.ca to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 11 months agomessage-square91fedilink
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down4·11 months agoThat’s XML though… not that I’m disagreeing.
minus-squarehuginn@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up27arrow-down1·11 months agoNot XML. JSX. It’s javascript’s answer to markup.
minus-squaredukk@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·11 months agoThe worst of both worlds…
minus-squarekarmiclychee @sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·11 months agoIt’s like a weaponized grade of whatever they made CSS in JS out of
minus-squarehuginn@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoIf you put it into an XML parser it will throw an error, so it’s no longer XML. Sure it was based on it, but it’s not xml.
That’s XML though… not that I’m disagreeing.
Not XML. JSX. It’s javascript’s answer to markup.
Gross.
The worst of both worlds…
It’s like a weaponized grade of whatever they made CSS in JS out of
deleted by creator
If you put it into an XML parser it will throw an error, so it’s no longer XML.
Sure it was based on it, but it’s not xml.