When I opened this site 5 days ago, I could not have guessed that I would post
such a post. But here we are. As you know, we did a poll on this topic here
[https://lemmynsfw.com/post/26029]. Around 40% of people said to block, the rest
said to not to. In such cases, we wanted to make the poll, even though it
doesn’t matter. Right now, I’m still currently agreeing with @bobbiguy2122
[https://lemmynsfw.com/u/bobbiguy2122] here
[https://lemmynsfw.com/comment/82152]. We are going to let community moderators
handle the situation in within limits. So it’s going to be users choice to
subscribe to that community or creating new one with his own rules. #### Why not
completely block it If we are going to split, there is so many fractions as
well. As someone who only likes women and plain porn, I don’t want to ban
tentacle, futanari or gay stuff. Because even though they are kinky, they are
also a pleasure. Being attracted to petite teens is just like these pleasures,
and the vast majority actually like it. I think we should not ban this pleasure
just because it is in a dangerous area. #### As a result First of all we will
explicitly ban IRL loli images. Although we will allow non-IRL content under
moderator control, tho we will control childish content independently of
moderators too. We will make this distinction according to images that look and
act like children. #### Defederation I see a lot of people are worried about
this situation. But I don’t care. Because as you can see, beehaw, one of the
largest instances, blocked the other 2 largest instances. This situation is
inevitable in NSFW only instances like us. As a result, you must have one main
account, where you can access all instances, and one NSFW account, where you can
only access NSFW content. For example, I don’t plan to block any instances on
this instance, except in extreme cases.
Lets not beat around the bush here, lots of people like to look at boobs and dicks.
Lemmynsfw was looking like a good place to go, but reading the “Loli” announcement thread where they equate drawn child porn to petite women, its clear the owner is not the right person to be hosting a NSFW instance for the majority of people.
Is there anywhere else that people can recommend?
There is undoubtably a need for such an instance. Can we discuss this like adults?
No, it says, and I quote the whole thing for you as you apparently lack reading comprehension, since your quote is literally not part of it:
I have so much respect for @yay but i can’t believe how poorly he wrote the update message, lol.
Here is what’s happening;
loli/shota are BANNED and not okay in any way.
IRL kids are BANNED OBVIOUSLY because no shit.
characters who are petite/young-looking but not obviously underage are ALLOWED because as an instance the votes decided that banning all of it was destructive, and differentiating between them can be impossible.
The line will continue to be up to the admins discretion, though we always appreciate input. And beyond this, individual communities can decide whether they want to outright ban all flat-chested etc. porn to be safe.
Any other clarifications necessary, just ask below. Thanks for reading. ~Restful
Yes, the backtrack, which was posted after my initial thread, which is a 180 on what was originally posted, but also goes on to say that its impossible to differentiate if its flat chested content.
All this could have been solved by saying “18+ only”, but instead they want to dance the pedo line and come up with their own rules based on breast size and “anime skin tones” and all this other nonsense.
This thread isnt missleading, I posted what I saw. Then they backtracked almost. If people didnt post about it and say they were leaving there wouldnt have been a backtrack.
No, it’s highly misleading: https://kbin.social/m/lemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com/t/42695/READ-THIS-clarification-on-the-decision-and-poll-results
Allowed are fictional content of characters where it becomes hard to exactly tell if they’re adult or not. Not obvious underage stuff.
The post title, direct quote
I see you did not even bother to read the clarification, nor the original question.
No I did, and they said
Then they go on to say there is a difference between teen and child, and then backtrack and say “noooo we banned loli”, after posting a thread titled
edit:
And now the title of the post is
No, it says, and I quote the whole thing for you as you apparently lack reading comprehension, since your quote is literally not part of it:
Yes, the backtrack, which was posted after my initial thread, which is a 180 on what was originally posted, but also goes on to say that its impossible to differentiate if its flat chested content.
All this could have been solved by saying “18+ only”, but instead they want to dance the pedo line and come up with their own rules based on breast size and “anime skin tones” and all this other nonsense.
This thread isnt missleading, I posted what I saw. Then they backtracked almost. If people didnt post about it and say they were leaving there wouldnt have been a backtrack.