Hi All,
I would like to choose a new email provider, where security and privacy of the email is one of my main concerns (nothing to hide, but want to keep my data private, differently than what happens with the major providers). I have read maaany posts and websites guides but I am still confused. I am happy to pay a euro or so /month, so I had reduced my choice to Mailbox, Posteo, Mailfence. The problem is that each of them has some flows that don’t let me go ahead with them!
Mailbox: uses PGP, so not straightforward to send encrypted emails (unlike with tutanota) and to have encryption at rest. No mobile app. Alias reuse after 90 days Posteo: no spam folder. ALias reuse after 24 months Mailfence : has no encryption at rest , no mobile app. Not sure about alias reuse

Have you got any comments on the above providers and /or other suggestions (except for Tutanota and Protonmail)? thank you, appreciated!

  • infeeeee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    Why do you need a mobile app? It’s just email, all IMAP clients should work.

    I have a mailbox address since years, never use the webui for checking mails, only for changing some settings, I access my mails with Thunderbird on desktop, Fairemail on Android. Both apps have builtin PGP, so you shouldn’t care what the provider supports.

    The spam filter in mailbox is glorious, never got a spam there.

    • Pablo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well imap isn’t encrypted, right? That’s why one can or rather needs to run a software with proton called proton bridge to get imap locally

      • infeeeee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes, but for me standards are more important than encryption. I can encrypt mails with pgp, than they are end to end encrypted, imap doesn’t matter. I considered proton when I switched to mailbox, but usually I don’t send encrypted mails, because the reciepents cant read them, so I wouldn’t use the pros of proton.

          • infeeeee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            If I send some proton encrypted email to a random gmail address what happens? On gmail side it’s not encrypted. So what’s the point for encrypting something only on one side? For PGP afaik we have to get the public key of the recipient so it requires some setup on both sides before the first mail. I wanted to say, usually I don’t send emails like this,I send them to mortals, who would freak out if I would start to speak about things like this.

            Once I setup pgp in thunderbird, but I never had the incentive to setup again after a reinstall, because I never used it (I still have my keys saved though). For encrypted communication about important topics I use Signal, and I could convince my most important friends to install it.

            • Pablo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              You have two ways. Either the person made there public key available or you set a password for your mail that only you and the receipient know (you may want to forward a mail and share the password via Signal).

              Yeah I’m also mostly using Signal but at least Proton provides an easy ux/ui to encrypt mails.

    • cool9@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thank you. If I have not confused the different email proveiders, with mailbox encryption in transit is always active, while it needs to be activated while at rest. I do not understand why someone would not want their emails to be encrypted even at rest, by the way.