• ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    At the same time, $150 million could fund a shitload of free or discounted rides for poor people if it was administered as a social program with the same decrease in fare skipping.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      1 year ago

      Public transit trips create positive externalities by reducing car trips. In order to maximize societal good, the best fare price for public transit is $0 for everybody.

      • cogman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup, public transit fares are regressive taxes.

        A better city would have free public transit and pay for it by taxing the businesses that insist on nobody working remotely.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Can you imagine? Every business taxed according to the total transit time of their workers.

          Either everyone lives in dense housing or everything becomes remote, it’d be amazing!

          • kautau@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            lol the wealthiest people that work in New York don’t live in New York, they mostly live in Connecticut and other close states. I’m all for it. Tax the companies that need their execs to show up the most, based on their salary, and then watch the boomers that don’t like working remote get feisty about the tax, especially because they usually have equity in the company they work for