A boob, a butt, or even some violence like one might see on the news anyway, Iām not freaked out about all that and I donāt feel the need to hide it from those around me usuallyā¦ thatās all fine fine, but I donāt want porn on my feed like at all.
Editing for clarity here:
Those are all things that might get flagged NSFW that I donāt mind seeing in general. Iām not uptight about it, itās just a little different to be inundated with hardcore pornography likeā¦ while on the train.
I joined a primarily social insurance, kbin.social. I am very open to what is in my feed, sometimes to the extremer ends of that. I just believe that porn is a separate thing entirely and should be separated in some way. Iām not opposed to porn, but thereās a reason it had its own room in the video store. And if youāre wanting to look at porn, thereās a good chance youāre ONLY looking for porn at that moment.
deleted by creator
I have artful nude line drawings in my house for all to see. People post most-of-butt pics on Instagram all day. Thatās different from jack-off material.
deleted by creator
I see asses at work sometimes. Literally just need to not see porn or extreme gore.
deleted by creator
Nope, literally just think a āpornā designation to filter out all content that is actually porn. This includes soft core porn, just all nudity, which is also how the law works because itās illegal to show pornography to a minor but the rest of the nsfw category is down to a guardians discretion on whatās appropriate. Itās not a huge ask, youāre splitting hairs here, I just want an option filter out porn and thatās it.
deleted by creator
Youāre not this thick and I know it.
That unfortunately is not how browsing āAllā works. You see subs that users on your instance subscribe to.
deleted by creator
I never asked for a boobs tag. I was stating that Iām not personally offended if a stray nipple appears in my feed. But overall, porn, including most nudity, should be able to be filtered from the feed while still receiving content from subs I havenāt subscribed to.
Iāve been saying the same every time this topic comes up. People seem too afraid to enable ONE setting while they are out in public and extemely afraid of porn, but showing violence to people at work or kids in the bus is ok, right? Why not block all that to be safe? Just disable that filter at home, itās not that hard, the posts they missed during the day will be there when they get home, they can watch all their precious violence there.
I agree for having granular filters because Iām ok with porn and erotism, but I donāt want to watch gore, scarejumps or other type of shock content, but having a full NSFW filter is needed and should stay, people just need to use it.
Nobody ever said to get rid of the NSFW filter
Iām not an avid consumer of violence, Iām not craving it. A general NSFW is great, and Iām not against it. Iām not sure if you were trying to disagree with me here or not, since people keep trying to talk me into arguing points that I never actually had any intention of arguing I donāt even know what is directed at me at this point.
The number of false equivalencies across the entire thread here is wild, because people somehow think porn is under threat or something. I am a freelancer and look at kbin for fun at home, ANY use of social media while Iām actually at work is kinda NSFW because Iām supposed to be working. I browse the internet at home, where the eyes that might see my phone are a teenage son and a girlfriend.
Should I be browsing, and somehow the kid sees that thereās a news report or shared image of a dead Russian soldier on the ground, or a portrait featuring a barely visible nipple, heās mature and I can contextualize that for him. He has seen R rated movies with sex scenes, whatever. None of that is a big deal. Hardcore pornography is a different deal. Any granularity beyond that is great.
Also apples are not oranges.