Those seem incompatible to me.

(UBI means Universal Basic Income, giving everyone a basic income, for free)

  • Kalkaline @leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    UBI on it’s own is not a problem for me. Where I take issue is when politicians say “we’ll give you cash instead of these social safety net programs”. I think you have to have a mix of UBI and social safety net programs. It’s all about raising the floor of the lowest living conditions we’ll allow and right now, in America at least, we have too many rich people and too many poor people. A UBI of $1000/month doesn’t help a person stuck in an ICU for months at a time and will just discharge to a SNF/LTAC facility.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m still not sure if he was actually in favor or just pandering, but at least he put it on the stage.

        • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah. I supported Yang to help popularize the idea but he’s just a wolf in sheep’s skin trying to get rich.

          • flames5123@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            How so? I canvased for Yang in 2019, but after he dropped, I kinda just stopped thinking about him. I know he started the Forward Party, and he’s had some bad takes on homelessness, but how is he a wolf in sheep’s clothing? He apparently has a net worth of at least a couple million living in New York, but he’s in his 40’s, so that‘s not really that far off from normal businessmen.

        • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I knew Yang was a fraud from the start. It was his “you have a freedom to choose between UBI and safety social nets” that made it clear to me. Took a long fucking time for other left leaning folks to catch on. He was getting way too much attention. That’s actually why I liked Michael Brooks so much. He was one of the few at the time that saw through it

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Social safety net programs are fine but unless they’re universal they’ll inevitably create benefit cliffs which punish people for making more money. They also cost money to administer. UBI is super cheap and easy to administer: if you’re a citizen you get a check or deposit every month. Simple. You could probably manage the entire operation with less than 1000 people.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The perverse incentive structure of non-universal aid is one of the most fucked up things our society does.

    • ansiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s basically the Social Security plus Medicare combo like seniors in America get. It’s not great or perfect but even if that’s all you live on you can get by ok. The USA could just lower the ages. I know lowering the Medicare age comes and goes in the conversation about healthcare reform