• onepinksheep@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The misuse of this meme is one of my biggest meme pet peeves. Have people forgotten that in that scene, his vision is clear when he’s not wearing glasses? So the meme should be the other way around.

    • Synapse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Like many memes, this one exists outside of the original oeuvre (movie, painting, etc). For instance, I have not see the movie it comes from, it wouldn’t makes sense to me if it was the other way around.

  • GenBlob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Nothing is worse than seeing chromium-based browser users fight other chromium-based browser users. You are all using the same fucking thing!

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      “It’s funny to see people who use cars with V-8’s argue about other models and makes of cars with V-8’s, you’re all using the same fucking thing!”

      See how absolutely stupid as fuck that sounds? Cause all cars are different even though they use virtual identical model of engines? That’s what you sound like.

      • Hypx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        People are worried that Google controls the project. Anyone using Chromium is basically making their own version of Chrome but with extra features.

      • Hypx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        From what I understand, Gecko was a terrible engine from the get-go. It is also difficult to work with, and had a lot of idiosyncrasies that made hard to build anything that isn’t just a clone of Firefox. There’s a reason why Apple used KHTML as the basis of Safari and not Gecko. Even Brave is based off of Chromium, and the founder of Brave is one of Mozilla’s founders!

        So apparently no, Gecko is not it. We need something closer to a pure browser engine that is open source.

      • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        When that source, open or otherwise, is unilaterally controlled by Google, that doesn’t really mean much

        • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          No, it’s not. It’s open source and can be modified from Google’s baseline to be free of their restrictions by anyone who cares to put in the work, like Brave and Vivaldi.

          • buzzbald@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Are people able to make meaningful contributions to the project upstream to steer the direction of the web as an open platform?

            • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              In every way Linux has the potential to in a world where 99% of people would rather just use Windows, sure.

              Most people are just going to use Chrome and don’t give a shit. If you’re developing/using a different browser then yeah you probably have the ability to significantly impact the way web browsing happens going forward. As any fork of chromium is it’s own thing and has the ability to become the new standard.

  • danielton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Honestly, my biggest fear if Apple ever allows other browser engines on iOS is that developers will stop testing on anything other than Chrome. And they will tell iPhone users to “just download Chrome.”

    I’ve already heard so many places tell people not to use Firefox or Safari to access their website. It’s IE 6 all over again. I hate Chrome and refuse to use it.

      • danielton@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I hate how everybody seems to be OK with this because Chromium is nominally open-source, when that ended up being the whole reason we are in this mess.

    • thehatfox@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes, it’s a sad state of affairs that Apple’s restrictions on iOS and iPadOS browsers are the only thing stopping an effective Google monopoly over web browsers. Ideally Firefox would still keep things in balance, but Mozilla doesn’t seem to know what it’s doing these days in terms of building market share - and I say that as a long time Firefox user.

      I still remember the IE 6 era, and I hope we never see a single browser dominate the web again. To those wishing Apple would be forced to open up, be careful what you wish for.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Firefox is in a pickle, because unlike the IE/Firefox, where FF was winning share by the boatload against a stagnant competitor, Chrome is super actively developed, active and heavily pushed by Google. Basically FF is now kept alive by Google the way you’d keep a single competitor city alive in Civilization to ensure you game wouldn’t end with a military/domination victory. FF is a Native American reservation surrounded by white folks not giving a shit about what happens on your dust bowl.

        But yes, FF for life for me!

  • ninetynine@lemmy.film
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Bring back Netscape! Actually I would take the old Opera. That was my browser of choice prior to the chrome integration.

  • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    God damn I thought I saw the last of these stupid browser takes on reddit, chromium is open source and we’ve seen multiple browsers (Brave, Vivaldi, I think librewolf) using its potential to remove themselves from the chromium baseline and build out their own fork with ad blocking services that didn’t go down when manifest V3 happened.

    There’s no “browser monopoly” anymore than there’s a “V shaped engine” monopoly in cars. Why don’t people use Gecko more? That’s like asking why people don’t use rotary piston engines in cars, you could, it’s just garbage. Gecko isn’t the standard because no one wants to build a web browser with it.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        not to mention just shitty to use.

        Come back to me when Firefox has workspaces, tab stacking, a side panel, and the rest of the aesthetic customization of Vivaldi.

        You’re a fanboy, clearly, but you haven’t actually argued why Firefox is better, just that you like it more because you’re seething at chromium.

        Firefox lost because it used to be shitty and everyone just assumed it still is, whoops. Better luck next time. When Vivaldi stops blocking ads natively without an installed ad blocker (still haven’t noticed any YouTube ads post V3) I’ll consider switching. Until then, this “bUt cHrOmiUm” shit is just a joke.

        • donnachaidh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          None of that is chromium. Vivaldi could have built that on top of Firefox, but didn’t. As to why Firefox is better, the very fact that it’s an alternative that is keeping up technically is a benefit. It’s less a ‘V-shaped engine’ monopoly and moreso a ‘V8 engine made by a specific company’ monopoly. They have far too much control over the direction of web standards. Much of what they are doing is actually good, but it should then be spread based on merit, rather than because they directly control almost the entire market.