• PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Technically it would be emolument. Luckily, there is an emoluments clause in the constitution, (Article I, Section 9, Paragraph 8) which explains that the president isn’t allowed to accept emoluments from foreign powers while in office. And the man just told on himself on Twitter.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately, no. The US isn’t presently at war with Russia or China or… basically anyone (with the obvious loophole of proxy and ally wars…), so nobody is capable of legeally-defined treason.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Everybody like to trot that word out, but is unable to define a legal “enemy”. I consider Russia a fucking enemy, hate their guts, but legally and diplomatically, they’re not that.

          • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/4302

            It’s pretty clearly defined.

            The word “enemy,” as used herein, shall be deemed to mean, for the purposes of such trading and of this chapter— (a) Any individual, partnership, or other body of individuals, of any nationality, resident within the territory (including that occupied by the military and naval forces) of any nation with which the United States is at war, or resident outside the United States and doing business within such territory, and any corporation incorporated within such territory of any nation with which the United States is at war or incorporated within any country other than the United States and doing business within such territory.

        • Can_you_change_your_username@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We’re still at war with North Korea. There is a declared ceasefire that has mostly held since 1953 but the latest peace talks to end the war started in 2018 and fell apart after South Korea elected a conservative government in 2023. The soldier that escaped to NK to avoid his legal troubles in SK last year may well have committed treason. Or at least attempted to, NK didn’t really seem to want him.

  • jantin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t get $8 million for doing nothing

    Aaand there goes the last credible line of defense: that his only connection was ownership and he was detached from operations and books of the company. But alas.

    • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes but he was president at the time so he is immune to all prosecution because he did the crime(s) FOR America. Duh!

    • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, I think he needs to be able to still run for president. It would set a bad president if political rivals could be jailed to prevent them from running. But this dude needs to be in jail, like now.

        • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          My apologies. And, yeah. He’s 100% a traitor. I hope the rest of his days he molders in pathetic political impotence. Just worried that a “people in jail can’t rum for president law” would have unintended consequences.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        He just admitted to taking money from other national governments while he was an elected official. He should never be allowed to run for another public office ever again.

        • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think for the countries freedom, we have to let him run, but if there is any sanity or dignity left here, I pray he loses, and I pray the republican party shatters so something more reasonable can take its place.

      • the_q@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well he was impeached twice and yet another thing that has no bearing on eligibility to run.

        • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In a perfect (or just not bat shit crazy) world, it wouldn’t matter. You should be able to let anyone run and the voters would just never in a million years vote for an asshole or criminal or both. But alas…

        • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Very true, and also (unfortunately) good I think. I don’t want a republican congress able to prevent a second term via impeachment trial.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Totally not punishable, the state can do nothing about it but watch him become its leader again.

    But don’t you fucking dare being black and having a bud of weed on you, thats pretty much a death penalty offense.

    Yep, totally a democracy.

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nope, it’s much more an oligarchy with democratic elements to feed the perception of freedem in the masses. If your choice is between open support of genocide and totalitarianism and genocide it is hardly a democracy.

  • MxM111@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unrelated, but this news source has higher number of ads per square inch of my phone screen than I thought theoretically possible.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like the intrusive ad world has been working mega overtime lately. Either that or I just haven’t been paying close enough attention but lately I’ve stumbled on some mobile sites that are like 97% ads with 15 automatically playing videos and pop ups everywhere that are hilariously difficult to close without opening ten more windows

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Something something firefox mobile something something adblock.

      I’m sure you’ve heard it, and I have no idea if you’re already using it and it doesn’t work. Just thought I’d get it in there before someone else who’s even more of a dick about it.