• postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Lol what a pathetic taunt.

        Edit for the ultra daft downvote crew: the fact the US killed civilians is directly relevant to the blub i responded to, the one claiming the US was bettter than Israel because it did not kill civilians.

        For the extra determined ignoramouses ive provided this as an example :

          • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Your link to the definition of ‘avoid’?

            I avoided nothing. I addressed the issue directly.

            The USA kills civilians.

            Israel does at a much faster rate. A genocidal one in fact.

            But that does not give any creedence to the notion the USA is innocent.

            QED JFC

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Now you’re moving the goalpost. Dude, just admit your wrong. The US goes to great lengths to avoid civilian casualties.

              • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Nevwr moved the goal posts. You just need a bit more reading comprehension.

                And no, civilian damage and deaths will not prevent the USA from striking targets.

                Look up Obama’s record of drone striking weddings.

                It is why i left the industry.

                Ive been inside DARPA and the Pentagon discussong collateral damage.

                Avoiding it is not a priority.

                Why?

                1. to be feared by tge enemy

                2. so the enemy cannot use human shields

                But directly targeting non combatants and hiding behind ‘faulty intelligence’ has been a common occurance.

                Remember the car full of water and children the US blew up as they left Afghanistan?

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  You should really read that definition of avoid. Because you keep using it as an absolute term when it very much is not.

                  And I don’t care if you were some white coat back in the States. I was on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan. If we weren’t worried about avoiding civilian casualties we wouldn’t have gotten out with so few.