• mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Making a strike “illegal” is more or less enacting slavery. Good on the teachers.

    • TheChurn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The strike was “illegal” meaning that it did not have the traditional protections afforded striking workers, such as being unable to be fired, and the union was fined for each day the strike continued.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has ruled that even using the word “strike” constitutes “inducing, encouraging or condoning a work stoppage by public employees.” Union leaders who do so risk fines—personally and as elected leaders—and even jail time.

        That’s what it means that the strike was illegal. (Citation)

      • BossDj@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        There are more states that ban public sector strikes then there are those where it is protected

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    “technically this is an illegal strike”

    but technically workers have no rights, never cross a picket line

    Never cross a picket line, always support workers fighting for justice.

  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s never illegal to strike. Jesus Christ.

    Impromptu, unannounced, sure. I could see that being annoying for parents.

    But fuck illegal as a way to describe strikes.