A growing number of instances (mainly of Mastodon so far) are signing an ‘Anti-Meta Fedi Pact’, pledging to block any instance owned by Meta in the fediverse.

I don’t know how big this will get or how effective it will be, but if you run a fediverse instance, you should take a look at this https://fedipact.online/

  • kjr@kbin.social
    2·
    2 years ago

    @Mr_Jabroni they can get data without a context, what is a big problem for the integration. For instance, to coreference accounts in different platforms, they cannot do it based on the name, but they can do it building a graph of interactions and learning from it… just as an example. Of course everyone can do the same, the problem is that Meta has not only the skills and resources, but that it is a substantial part of their business model.
    I don’t claim that the Anti-Meta pact is a solution, I am far to know how is possible to go ahead with the situation. A first step is that the user should be allow to decide which instances cannot access her/his data, something that in Mastodon is already possible.
    An additional problem is that after some representatives of big Mastodon servers took part in a meeting with Meta under NDA, I have a big problem of trust.
    @LollerCorleone @Silejonu

    • hot_guava@lemmy.world
      2·
      2 years ago

      There’s nothing stopping them from setting up a stealth instance and doing this now, right? Who’s to say any instance isn’t already being run by Facebook for data mining?

      • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
        41·
        2 years ago

        Who’s to say nazis aren’t meeting in secret right now? You still punch them in their fashy faces when they try to hold rallies on the street.

        There is a cost to being relegated to the shadows we should be eager to make them pay.

        There is likewise a value to people seeing Meta shunned.

        Just because, “they could do it anyway” doesn’t mean we should resign ourselves to them doing it openly much less collaborate with their doing it.