While Education and Organizing is building the parts for a new engine the rest of the year.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because America isnt voting for change. They’re just moving towards fascism, either slow or fast.

      If you tell anyone to change course and vote third party they get really mad at you here on Lemmy.

    • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hence educating and organizing the other 364 days of the year.

      • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think a better strategy is to run for office rather than vote. Because voting doesn’t do much if the available candidates are turncoats or shills. It should be educate, organize, and run. Otherwise we get more Scinemas running for raising minimum wage and not at all voting for it when it counts most.

        • harmsy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’d say the people who voted third party are the ones who fucked around in 2016, and ALL of us found out because of it.

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          10 months ago

          Dems deciding to fuck around and find out…

          Yeah! Sending minorities to concentration camps will really show those Dems!

          • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Punch up not down. Democrat leadership decides on policy, Democrat leadership decides on election strategy.

            “I won’t vote for leader that heinous thing x” is a reasonable position to have. “I will vote for leader that doesn’t heinous thing y” is also a reasonable position to have.

            The compromise isn’t to get people to vote for x, it’s for the leader to stop x. Particularly, if the opponent would do x but worse. That only shows, to the Democrat leader, y is a resonable cost for x.

            • PugJesus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              “I won’t vote for leader that does heinous long-standing thing that most of the electorate agrees with even though the only other viable candidate wants to pursue an even worse policy on the issue!” is just “I support heinous long-standing thing getting worse!” with extra steps.

              • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Except those that don’t vote to support the thing can’t be said to support the thing at all. “Those that didn’t support the thing are the same as those that wanted it more” is self-serving at best and intellectually dishonest at worst. By the same token I wouldn’t suggest anyone that votes Democrat supports anything the Democrats do because that would also be self serving at best and intellectually dishonest at worst.

                I get you’ve had these arguments before, I’ve certainly read them, and I’m not trying to rehash them.

                The point that I’m tying, and failing I suppose, to make is the frustration/anger is misplaced.