• PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Polls have consistently ranged between 66-85% saying they want somebody other than Biden.

    And yet when specifics come up, there is no consensus candidate other than Biden.

    It’s how he won the last primary. He was the second-choice of a larger and more divided pool of other candidates - we’ve always wanted someone other than Biden. The issue is that we can’t agree on who that would be.

    And his popularity is only shrinking. at best, any election with biden and trump as the two candidates are going to be nail biters, with DNC peeps having to work two, three times as hard to get the vote out than virtually any other candidate they could pick.

    I really think you’re underestimating the advantages of name recognition and incumbency.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I really think you’re underestimating the advantages of name recognition and incumbency.

      if Biden were to support and go to bat for any other candidate his name recognition and incumbency could be made to work for them.

      That he doesn’t do that… is a matter of his own ego.

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        if Biden were to support and go to bat for any other candidate his name recognition and incumbency could be made to work for them.

        Incumbency and name recognition don’t work like that, as a great many outgoing politicians who endorse and campaign for their picked protégé find out.

        That he doesn’t do that… is a matter of his own ego.

        Influenced by his ego, sure, but not simply a matter of ego. I would have loved for Biden to step down as a one-term president, but I also understand that there is a matter of political calculation in this.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          If they can’t solve the problem in the last seven years, what makes you think they’ll solve it in the next five?

          This is a bed of the DNC’s own making and just further evidence that they’re too out of touch to actually effectively govern.

          • PugJesus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            How is that relevant to the argument we were having? We were discussing Biden’s electability and whether incumbency and name recognition are linked to his running for president, not whether the DNC can govern, or what problem(?) wasn’t solved in the past 7 years.

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              the problem of not having groomed new talent.

              They haven’t had new talent in more than 7 years. that’s why they went with the “compromise” candidate, while promising to groom that talent so that it won’t happen again.

              yet another of Biden’s broken campaign promises. like “restricting superpacks” and bringing “transparency if campaign financing”… because he really needs those AIPAC donations, right? and speaking of AIPAC donations, what about that promise to end the wars in the middle east? Dropping bombs on Houthi’s because you gotta back up the genocidial maniac (see superpac funding).

              • PugJesus@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                the problem of not having groomed new talent.

                Again, that’s not what we were discussing.

                Dropping bombs on Houthi’s because you gotta back up the genocidial maniac (see superpac funding).

                Dropping bombs on Houthis because they’re attacking civilian ships in one of the most used commercial routes in the world.

                • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Dropping bombs on Houthis because they’re attacking civilian ships in one of the most used commercial routes in the world.

                  Because his best friend is going all genocidal. Biden is actively escalating tensions with a slapped on veneer of legitimacy

                  • PugJesus@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    And do you think if the US wasn’t in support of Israel, the Houthis would just… what, stop?