• cmbabul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    5 months ago

    When I read shit like this I realize I don’t know a damn thing about computers

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        What the fuck, see know nothing about computers, despite a career in IT and a homelab addiction

        • Buddahriffic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s all data, whether that data is text, an image, audio, or a binary containing computer code.

          Raw audio data is just a series of amplitudes. It has a bit depth (which says how many bits are in each amplitude sample) and a frequency (what is the change in time going from one amplitude to the next). Using those, you can convert it to an analog signal that can be played on a speaker. And if you use the same values to convert that signal back to digital, you end up with the same input signal (though with some random noise added and if you get unlucky and your sample phase lines up with the player’s transition phase, you won’t be able to extract the original signal, though it might sound similar). The multiple recordings help mitigate these issues.

          Given that data format, any arbitrary file can be treated as raw sound that can be transmitted as analog audio.

          The only real difference between this and other transfer methods we use to transfer files is that this involves a less reliable conversion from digital to analog back to digital because it wasn’t designed to do that like USB, COM, wifi, etc connections are.

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sending data over audio was how dial up Internet worked. My guess here is that the audio playing hardware loses the ability to come to a stopping point at the end of the audio file after a crash and starts playing the data in the memory after the audio file ends as if it were audio.

          • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            The guy who uploaded the video that corporate content farm is “reporting” on actually covers exactly why this happens. In short, the gba plays sound from a certain part of ram, which a cpu interrupt continously refreshes. In the event of a crash, it keeps playing sound, but doesn’t get the interrupt to keep it playing the proper data from ram. If you let it cycle through all of ram, it eventually leaks out and just starts playing, well, everything else, eventually getting to the game rom. Relevant Videos

          • astrsk@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            A signal is a signal. For system hardware developers it might have been a quick and dirty way to debug the hardware. It could also be an abandoned feature for low level developers and cartridge development teams. We may never know the real answer but it’s not an unreasonable thing to use the thing designed to output waves as a quick hookup point for logic analyzers / oscilloscopes.

            • fidodo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              I had a major brain fart and forgot you can connect audio over a cable too. Yeah, now that I’m thinking about it more it wasn’t that uncommon to transfer data over aux back in the day. I was imagining using a microphone which would have been silly.

          • PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I really don’t know.

            If I had to guess possible reasons off the top of my head:

            1: the aux cable and port are a very common for factor for electronics of all sorts, especially computers. So you could probably transfer that data to non-Gameboy devices and not have to manufacturer more proprietary GB ports which you may also have to write drivers for on your non-GB hardware. And your customers would also go through the hustle, if you require them to use your proprietary debugging hardware and drivers, when they inevitably test and debug their own games for your console.

            2: in the event of a crash, the kernel might better be able to handle the aux than the proprietary port. Pure speculation by me.

            Regardless of any possible reasons or strangeness, it just seems much more probable to me that the behavior of dumping the rom over the audio port is a design choice rather than a coincidence.

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Program code for a Gameboy game wouldn’t normally be sent through an audio port so this is pretty weird.

      • Buddahriffic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Could be that their audio playback is done by hardware reading from a low address buffer in parallel to the rest of the logic and just relies on that logic to update pointers otherwise it will run through the entire address space.

        Or it could be their way of implementing a full address space dump on a crash without large amounts of storage available and that just includes the ROM because it’s a part of that address space. But in the video, they were able to get a 100% match for the ROM using an emulator, so this isn’t it unless they didn’t mention chopping off a RAM section.