• happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I wonder how one would work for LLMs that are also being trained off intellectual property. Flooding it with nonsensical references maybe?

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why do Lemmy users suddenly care about copyright and intellectual property when it’s bad for AI? What do you have against AI? It’s a really useful tool that democratises creativity.

      • happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I don’t give a shit about IP. My computer has three hard drives full of pirated material and it’s only because I don’t need a fourth yet. However, I obviously oppose AI because that “dEmOcRaTiSaTiOn Of CrEaTiViTy” is an assault on creative labour in the same way the powered loom was on artisanal. If you aren’t standing up for yourself as a worker you’re a fucking dog who’s distracted by the toys you’re given by your betters.

        edit: But to clarify approaching it from the standpoint of IP is just the most useful weapon against it. There’s the broadest base of support for the broadest level of regulation short of outright banning AI models, and I’m also for that.