Relegated in 2006 to an optional piece of learning in Ontario elementary schools, cursive writing is set to return as a mandatory part of the curriculum starting in September.

  • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bad experiences around bad teachers will exist regardless of whether cursive is taught, though. Teachers aren’t perfect.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t say anything about bad teachers. My criticisms are still valid even if assuming teachers are perfect.

      • tartra@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Was this something specific to cursive?

        I’m not surprised that kids would’ve had awful experiences, especially because this is a skill that takes time to develop, and time is often the thing in the shortest supply when it comes to teaching kids.

        But you wrote your post like there was something particularly unique to the awful experiences had with learning cursive writing. I wasn’t expecting that. Does it have to do with how you can ‘get away’ with messing handwriting in math or even in English, but when you’re being graded on the appearance of cursive letters, any fine motor skills a child is struggling with gets piled on?

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, it has to do with the fact that ability to acquire fine motor skills vary a great deal between individuals and many students simply cannot learn to write at what educators consider an acceptable level of quality, no matter how many hours you force them to do lines, no matter how many times you tell them they are sloppy, or lazy, or stupid. They simply cannot do it, any more than a one-legged student can do the triple jump. But unfortunately these students and their unique needs are hard to detect and mostly they are just stigmatized as slow or difficult.

          I don’t know if you understand how harmful and undermining it is to be set up to fail like that. It’s cruel. Once upon a time, it might have been worthwhile overall that some students had to suffer that, but it no longer is.

          We just do not have the facilities to address the unique needs and very common disabilities of children, we’ve gutted all of that. If you want to teach cursive, how about we first start supporting students with disabilities. That’s something parents SHOULD be upset about. This is just bullshit distraction, because it’s designed to be a bullshit distraction.

          • tartra@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sorry I took so long to reply! I’m still not used to Lemmy. :P

            That was an excellent answer. I imagine it’s further compounded by how kids are sorted into grades, with someone being born very late to the grade’s cut-off having a disadvantage to someone born many months earlier/at the start of the cut-off.

            From what you wrote, I’m almost persuaded to think that it’s something kids should be taught in school, but far later. I’m back on the boat of having calligraphy classes offered in high school as electives. The trouble is, once I suggest that, I feel like it’s setting myself up to be argued into having it at a much younger age and as a mandatory part of education, which puts us right back into the problems you listed out. :(