She literally called me at the time of the appointment to tell me she can’t see me. She was so apologetic, but was like “I absolutely can treat you, but I’m not allowed by your insurance”. Fuck this country.

Update: I went to urgent care. Before leaving home, I called to be sure they would accept my insurance (Aetna). They said yes… After arriving for my appointment, they told me they do not accept my insurance. I will simply leave without paying.

Final Update: I can understand that that differences in physical biology demand different attention. That’s not what I’m complaining about. It’s the way it’s set up. I was told that at my appointment. Why not just refer me to a specialist? The website could’ve even just referred me to urgent care (yes, my insurance requires a primary care physician’s referral for urgent care, according to the urgent care facility). But, no, their goal is to obfuscate and irritate until the patient gives you and pays out-of-pocket.

I was able to receive care at a cost I could not afford. I won’t discuss what I had to do to “find” the money to pay for care and prescriptions. That being said, the condition I was diagnosed with was more serious than a simple infection, and I’m glad that I saw a doctor. I need further treatment and just hope I can get insurance to cover any of it.

If you’re an American reading this, please consider ways to get involved in organizing in support of Medicare For All in your community. Here is one resource I have found. We don’t need to live like this. We deserve better. Stay safe and healthy, friends.

  • guyman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Sounds like discrimination based on sex. A clear violation of the Civil Rights act of 1964.

    • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Car insurance companies are literally allowed to discriminate by sex and will openly tell you that they do so, why would health insurance be different?

      • UniquesNotUseful@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits different treatment of insured persons on the basis of their sex in connection with pension funds. This was a supreme court ruling, so kind of linked but not quite.

        https://www.jstor.org/stable/253100

        Interestingly, in UK and EU it became illegal to discriminate by sex for car insurance from about 2012, without very careful use of data - which doesn’t happen. It is allowed to be linked on things like jobs though.

        • STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          newsflash: US never cared about civil rights and despite it being “law” it gets regularly ignored on an institutional scale

    • average650@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      It might be, but some health related coverage is legitimately divided along sex lines. I don’t know what the answer is, but it might not be so simple.

      Stupid either way though.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you think that’s discrimination, don’t look at the marketing industry.

      Discrimination based on biological factors is literally what insurance companies do.

  • salt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Are you sure this isn’t just a CVS thing? It says the same thing for me and I know my insurance covers UTIs for everyone. Maybe try an urgent care?

    • DRx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is correct… there is 2 things to remember here

      1. CVS only has nurse practitioners, nurses, or pharmacists that are doing the screening, and must refer for certain cases
      2. There are 2 types of UTIs….
      • complicated and uncomplicated
      • Men ALWAYS have a complicated uti due to the anatomy of where the uti is located
      • women can have either, these NPs are only allowed to treat UNCOMPLICATED UTIS and must refer all complicated cases to a physician.

      FYI it has nothing to do with insurance

  • UnstuckinTime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    This country is f****** crazy. I remember like 8 years ago I was trying to get into rehab to kick opiates which I eventually did in 2015. When I got into a free bed for a detox, they wouldn’t let me in because it said my insurance wasn’t accepted. The irony was I didn’t have insurance anymore, they still had me listed as being insured with some s***** Blue Cross program at my old job.

    I actually had to get proof that I wasn’t insured so the state would cover my bed.

    Any other OECD Nation pretty much and you get treated like anyone else. And the sick part is both political parties are okay with this, and militantly fight any serious ever for a public health care system with one single risk pool where everybody is automatically opted in.

  • Uriel-238@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I can’t help but wonder what happens to girls 15 and under when they get UTIs. Insurance company says sucks to be a girl?

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Probably.

      We knowingly vote for this shitty health care system every two years, so why would they ever change?

      • Uriel-238@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        At the federal and state levels, we knowingly vote against King Heron so he doesn’t eat all the frogs. (That is, we vote against Republicans who are actively working to neuter democracy).

        Getting social safety net stuff, justice reform or even election reform will require grassroots pressure bigger than yhe George Floyd / BLM protests.

        And without those things, instead were going to get genocide politics and civil war.

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I think we convince ourselves we’re voting the way we do for good reasons, but since Reagan, our votes have resulted in conservative outcomes no matter who we elect. Obama even had a supermajority for six months of his presidency, and we still had to hear the usual excuses people make in order to deflect from criticism of Democrats.

          I say this as someone who voted Biden fully expecting him to govern as a conservative because I thought we needed a cultural victory against the resurgence of fascism. And, even with the 1/6 domestic terrorist event, we haven’t seen any real movement to stop those elements. If anything, they’ve grown stronger.

          I agree with your main point though, meaningful change is impossible now. It would take an existential threat greater than COVID for it to happen, and in a country where 40,000,000 people can’t afford to miss a day of work, it’s just impossible.

          • Gnothi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Obama even had a supermajority for six months of his presidency, and we still had to hear the usual excuses people make in order to deflect from criticism of Democrats.

            Another way of saying this is that with only 72 days of congress that Obama actually had a supermajority, he passed the largest expansion of healthcare coverage for Americans since medicare/medicaid.

            I guess that’s a conservative outcome to you though.

            • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              he passed the largest expansion of healthcare coverage

              Only if you can absorb being price gouged, otherwise you’re left in an ER to die. He had the power to enact universal health care and sided with lobbyists, and deserves full credit for it.

              It should also be noted that Obamacare was modeled off of the system Mitt Romney implemented when he was a state governor. It’s literally a conservative system.

              • Gnothi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                I’m going to assume you weren’t politically aware when Obamacare was being passed. It barely made it through as it was. There was absolutely zero chance universal health care could ever have been passed at that time. To claim Obama had the power to enact it is insane.

                Also, since Obamacare contained huge expansions for medicaid eligibility, and Obamacare is, as you claim, “literally a conservative system”, wouldn’t medicaid for all be the most conservative system of them all?

                Finally, no, no one is left in ERs to die, insured or not. Heck you don’t even need to be a citizen. That hasn’t been true since 1986. That said, you would get a hefty bill if they actually know who you are and I do fully support a system where that is not the case and one can get treatment without worrying about the cost.

  • bumbly@readit.buzz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is why mens’ rights activists exist. Unfortunately, just like the feminist movement, they were invaded by psychopaths.

  • Neuron@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This is mildly infuriating, I can give you a little more context though if you’re interested. I don’t know exactly about contracts between insurance companies and CVS so I can’t speak to that definitely. Probably something related to how much insurance is willing to pay minute clinic for such a short visit, and what things are feasible to address in such a short visit (hence CVS only allowing certain complaints).

    I think this is something to do with the concept of “uncomplicated” vs “complicated” uti. Complicated utis are when there’s an increased danger of serious complications from a uti or increased likelihood of failing a typical antibiotic therapy. Utis in men are much much rarer than women, and are considered to be an automatic “complicated” uti by many. The greater length of the urethra in men helps prevent bacteria from being able to travel up to the bladder, whereas in women the short distance allows for this to happen much more frequently. So when a male has a UTI there is a much greater chance there will be complicating factors like prostate issues, structural problems, kidney stones, kidney infection, catheter use, atypical bacteria, etc. If you look more into their info on utis, they also state if they suspect any of those things, even in women, they won’t treat it and will just refer you to someone else, probably the Ed or a real urgent care clinic. Since the odds of that are much greater in men, they probably aren’t allowed to have longer appointments in minute clinic based on what insurance will pay for what they’re providing, they just decided to not see that at all in minute clinic. Looks like they do see men for sexually transmitted infections though, which are actually the most common cause of utis in young men, so if that’s a concern looks like they would be able to see people for that.

    But I totally agree with you, fuck insurance companies in general.

    • throwaway38575061@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s very interesting, and I appreciate you taking the time to explain this in so much detail. I looked at urgent care near me, but my insurance requires a referral from a primary care physician first. I will continue to explore my options.

      • Neuron@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’ve never heard of urgent care requiring referral from a pcp, that wouldn’t make any sense as the whole point of urgent care is being seen more urgently than your primary physician can accommodate. And seeing people who don’t have a primary physician and keeping them out of the ed if not necessary. I would ask your insurance for that policy in writing, that can’t be right. And if it is it should be reported to that state insurance commission because that’s totally asinine. I mean never underestimate the dumbness of insurance companies but I think something might be being lost in translation here.

  • markon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is so ridiculous! Our system is beyond broken. If you’re sick you almost have to scrape by before Medicaid limit or pay out the ass and have excellent job with very good insurance. It’s so fucked up. This is truly nutty.

  • Froyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    This shouldn’t be infuriating at all. As others have said a Nurse Practitioner is not a Medical Doctor. Go to the “clinic”, whether its a hole in the wall $25 place or a local hospital with a clinic attached. A Medical Doctor can help and can even write prescriptions that include the words “medically necessary” which trumps most insurance denials.

  • deejay4am@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    There is no fucking shot she is correct. If your insurance won’t cover it then man just cancel it, they’d probably not even cover an ER visit, it should be cheaper to not have it.

    Also, report them to your state’s DOI.

    Is it because CVS is out of network? Have them bill, get denied, and then appeal it. Put that it would be cheaper than an ER visit for them.

  • Aux@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    That moment when it’s better to live in Russia than in US…

      • Ministar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        That is a fully incorrect statement. Just because objectively its better to live in US than Russia at this moment, does not mean that there is 0 good reasons to live in Russia. Stop thinking in extremes, every place has pros and cons, its just that some places have a lot more cons than pros.

          • Aux@lemmy.worldBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            No one in A&E checks your passport. I mean I’m not in Russia, but in the UK and the only reason some medical professional might check your ID here is when you’re signing up for GP services - these are territorial in the UK. Otherwise you just go to the clinic or hospital and get a treatment. I’m migrant from an xUSSR country, so healthcare there should be close in structure to Russian I believe. And again - no one checks your IDs, except for when you sign up for GP.

            And even when you need a GP, there is usually a framework for non-citizens. Usually when you sign up for GP they check your tax paying status. You pay taxes? Free healthcare for you! And in the UK if you don’t work and don’t pay taxes you can pay NHS contributions separately and then you will get all the treatment you want.

            So I believe Russia should be somewhere along these lines as well.

            • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Someone, ie insurance, has to pay for that medical coverage. I’m Czech and when I go to my doctor I give them my insurance card before I get treated. However, medical insurance isn’t “free” (well, government funded) for non citizens here either.

  • BurnTheRight@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    There is a cause and there is a solution for our disgusting system.

    Conservatives (including neo-liberals) serve corporations, not citizens. If we can marginalize conservatives (including neo-liberals), then we can have nice things like the other 31 developed nations on earth.

    This cannot improve while conservatives (including neo-liberals) have power in our nation’s government. Period.

  • lhx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yea it will. Just not at a minute clinic. You need to go to an actual urgent care or primary care doctor.

    • seedbrage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Just want to throw my 2c in. I’m a physician and from our perspective male UTIs are rare and warrant a much more thorough medical evaluation by a professional, compared to female UTIs which are extremely common and don’t require a thorough (or even in-person) evaluation in most cases. If I had a male patient with a UTI and no other know medical history I would insist they are seen by a physician for a complete evaluation. From other comments here it seems that CVS does not employ physicians in their clinic.

        • seedbrage@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          No, not what I said. His insurance will cover a primary care visit. The staff at the cvs are simply not qualified to treat a male UTI.

          • heili@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            People are dense. You straight out said this man needs more complete care to ensure that he can be helped because his condition could be more serious than if he were female, and they read “more thorough treatment” as “no treatment” like morons.

            CVS MinuteClinic is for super minor stuff. Doctors are for more serious things.

  • Lurch@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is a CVS thing and not an insurance provider issue. If you go to an in-network provider, they will treat your UTI.

    Two years ago I passed a kidney stone, that led to a UTI, and then sepsis. My insurance treated me without blinking. In fact, the only out-of-pocket costs I paid, was a $50 co-pay for the ER/hospital stay, and $8 co-pay for my aftercare antibiotic.

  • Kresten@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    While it probably is descrimination, I looked it up, and found out that UTI are much more likely for women than men, so at least it wasn’t the other way around to cheap out