• ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    They take up space that could be used to expand the house to liveable dimensions. And the lots are 6 m wide, enough for on-street parking.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Personally I would prefer 600 sq ft and some outdoor space over 1000 sq ft and no out door space, that’s the benefit of detached housing. Otherwise you may as well buy a 1000 sq ft apartment.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Well, the houses could be shorter (square), which is a more practical shape, and have the cost benefit of only two outside walls, with the rest of the plot being a backyard. And the houses could now include a garage with a liveable space above. Its advantages as opposed to a driveway are obvious: the car is protected from weather and crime, and owners of small or no cars can repurpose the extra space for DIY or other purposes. Also, a backyard, as opposed to a front yard, incentivizes non-lawn use, so the street appears less green from the front but actually benefits biodiversity. Backyards also feel more private, especially with tall fences.

        So yeah, I can get behind a 2-floor house with the footprint 55 m² (or 600 ft², don’t be afraid of superscripts) with green space, as long as half of it is not a concrete driveway and I can do some gardening (or even grow “private plants”).