In language school, our Japanese teacher told us that in Japanese writing, the type of stroke that you use is important. When learning Kana or Kanji, we should always take special note of Tome, Harai and Hane.
By now, I am wondering, how important that really is. Are there Kanji that you can only differentiate by the type of stroke? I imagine that it might be important when writing by hand, just because it will look strange.
For those who don’t know about the different types of lines, this page explains it quite well.
Although the current trend is towards to accept multiple character representations (e.g., 木 with/without hane are both correct),
- https://www.kanken.or.jp/kanken/saiten/
- https://www.bunka.go.jp/seisaku/bunkashingikai/kokugo/hokoku/pdf/92550601_01.pdf
the old trend is still left, so they (hane/tome/harai) are still important:
I’m sure someone with more experience can weigh in better than me. From my understanding, they are important to a degree, even outside of calligraphy, where of course they are very important.
Handwriting will start to deteriorate as people write faster and more sloppily. However, if they use the correct stroke types, it will deteriorate in a more predictable manner. I’m gonna be honest here, I do personally not pay attention to the stroke types, but for example if you look at “tome” vs. “harai”, doing stop pen -> lift pen means it’s way less likely for there to be a faint line from the end of one stroke to the start of the next one, as would often happen after sloppily writing a “harai” stroke.
This is the same reason why stroke order (and direction) is very important when it comes to legibility of handwriting.
I think it’s important for handwriting, but how often do you actually handwrite anything these days? You can read or type just fine without it.
