• drislands@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well put! And it’s funny, I feel like I’m seeing Dworkin referenced everywhere since I saw Contrapoints’ recent-ish video on JKR.

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m sure that’s just a coincidence, and that anyone who mentions Dworkin is just very well read.

      • drislands@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s the sense I’m getting – that she’s a great source often-cited. I figured I was most likely just experiencing Baader-Meinhof.

        • idiomaddict@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Andrea dworkin has some incredible points. And some that are a lot less palatable for modern feminists.

          I personally find her to be an often misguided, incredibly dedicated protector of women- I’m so glad she was formational in spreading modern feminism, but I have to double check what view of hers is cited. Sometimes she’s identifying a subtle pressure point in society as above, and sometimes she’s suggesting that men cannot have sex with women without being predatory, that heterosexual sex is inherently degrading to women and automatically statutory rape (obviously oversimplified). To be clear, I think that’s an interesting theory, and I can see using it as a thought experiment, but I think it’s very incorrect.