"In our catastrophic time - when we have so many wars - to destroy art is much more taboo than to destroy the life of a person," Andrei Molodkin says.
    • green_square@yiffit.net
      4·
      10 months ago

      I think they’re talking about art specifically. Like what’s the point of owning art if you ain’t showing anyone? And why should anyone care if ou destroyed art you weren’t willing to show it anyways?

      • Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world
        2·
        10 months ago

        Thanks. Original art have some kind of intrinsic aura, by the art proccess itself. That’s the difference between arts and craft or even art and design. The fact that concept of having the right to destroy art just because you’ve paid someone, sound so obvious and natural to people is weird…

    • Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world
      3·
      10 months ago

      Yeah I know how it works. I said the concept is weird, but it benefit some share holders, so I guess we’ll have to live with it