• Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      I would guess the argument is that the enforcement reduces the number of jumpers. So despite them running a negative on cost to catch. If the enforcement wasn’t there the number of jumpers would be high enough to justify the cost of enforcement. Having said that I don’t know if that is a knowable number.

      • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        They are spending 150million that is 1442x what they are losing, even if their enforcement is reducing the number of fare jumpers it would take basically everyone jumping the line to make up the difference.

        They’d save money just by eating the cost…

        I cannot see how this ever economically works out.

        Got some more numbers, this meme (surprise) isn’t telling the whole story. I’m still not saying it works out, but it’s not this simple.

        Okay so the MTA has a budget of 19billion, of which $6.870 billion comes from fares, in 2022 they lost $285million in subway fares, and the police caught 105,000 people in 2023.

        I cannot find where the $104k number is coming from, I assume that’s the total amount owed by those they caught, but if they caught 105k people that’s only a dollar a person so I don’t know if it’s that low or I’m misunderstanding the $104k number.

        Again not saying it works out, but I’m not smart enough to do that math…

    • escaped_cruzader@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      Can anyone explain to me what the consequence is for fare jumping if they don’t do this?

      Number one reason is that it pisses people off as it is unfair

      Humans, like monkeys, are allergic to unfairness and more people will just jump because they also want free shit

      These policing efforts are just there to keep the number of free riders to the expected parameter and placate the paying users

      Capturing back lost fares is inconsequential

    • Kedly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Cut back on enforcement, not removal of it completely. They wasted 149,900k chasing 100k. That money was still spent, and it likely wasnt preventing that amount of lost revenue

      • healthetank@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not sure where you get that from. Most systems operate at a major loss and are propped up by grants/government funding. Typical targets for operating are ~1/3 of costs are covered by rider fares with the rest coming from grants or government funding.

        Since the thread talks about NYC, I pulled this - MTA Budget. In it they state:

        In a normal year, farebox revenue constitutes approximately 40 percent of the MTA’s annual budget, or $6.5 billion

        • MNByChoice
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Thank you for getting those numbers. I appreciate knowing that fairs are far larger than the $150 million spent in enforcement (3 had wondered.)

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Do those numbers include advertising revenue? My city including ad revenue makes a small profit and they’re thinking of doing the free fair thing.

          • healthetank@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Appendix A in the report does.

            All told, their total operating revenue was 9.9bil, operating expenses were 13.1bil without including depreciation and pensions,etc which brought it to 16.1bil. that doesn’t include any improvements (capital) works or their debt servicing.