Yeah. They did exactly that

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    worse? What did I miss - it was never good to start with. Alexa, Siri, Cortana, Google Assistant - all they were ever used for was set timers and play songs.

    AI is the only hope to make them marginally more useful than they are.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Location-aware reminders is almost literally all I want from an assistant these days. “Remind me of x next time I’m at y, or by z time at the latest.” Is this an impossible task? I can imagine how I would code it, but maybe I’m missing something.

        • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think they just haven’t figured out how to monetize it, really. I agree that it’s totally codable. I could do it with tasker if it were my job, IE, I was paid to and had 8h a day to do it.

          • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Where’s the monetization in alarms, though? Or time-based reminders? Surely those are no more lucrative than what I’m asking for, yet they’ve existed for years.

            • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Fair point. Maybe they use the data for research?

              Without alarms and timers, they don’t sell the phone, probably.

    • colonial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      set timers

      This broke for me a few months ago. It just randomly… won’t start, despite saying otherwise.

      • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        “Set a timer that goes off at 9:15 am”

        *It proceeds to lecture me on the difference between an alarm and a timer, also, sets neither. *

        • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Ah, I think the wording confuses it.

          Timers are set for a duration. Alarms are set for a time. Which makes sense btw, you can’t set an egg timer to 9:15 either, you set it for, say, 21 minutes (if it’s 8:54 right now). And you don’t set your alarm clock for “in 6 hours”, you set it for 8:00.

          It’s a bit arbitrary, but this is exactly where I feel models such as Gemini or ChatGPT can actually improve things, because they can more readily leap from the keyword “timer” expecting a duration to that you actually meant “alarm” from the rest of the input, you just said timer instead.

          • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeah I understand, I got the lecture from Siri.

            The point is all timers are alarms, the end result of a timer going off is an alarm. If I’m cooking and I realize the rice has been on for about 7 minutes so it should finish up at 9:15, then that’s how I’m thinking about it, not doing the math to figure out what the specific number of minutes is between now and 9:15. That’s the goddamned robot’s job.

        • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Well they are different, so why would it set one if you didn’t specify what do you mean exactly

          • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Ok I’ve tossed this comment around in my head a few times, and I can’t fathom why you bothered to make it. What the fuck is the difference between an alarm that goes off at 9:15 and a timer that goes off at 9:15?

            • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.info
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Timer counts down time and can be paused; an alarm goes off at particular time and can only be snoozed after it goes off. Alarms take into account timezones and time changes, timers are absolute and independent of “clock” time

              • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                Yeah in theory but not if I tell it when to set the alarm off. It’s just useless pedantry. Like your virtual assistant is a redditor or something

      • folkrav@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 months ago

        My wife cannot set timers on our Nest Hub. It just doesn’t understand her command. I’ll say the exact same sentence right after and it’ll work. We did reset her voice profile, remove/add her back, checked all settings possible, nothing worked. Such a decent piece of hardware (speakers are actually pretty good, and the screen is decent and bright) that’s ruined by shitty software. It’s been unplugged for the last month and I didn’t even care. It’s going on Marketplace next week lol

          • folkrav@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I would have thought the same thing if it wasn’t that it used to work just fine, then one day it stopped working for her. One day, she tried setting alarms for dinner like she did every day before that, and it refused to comply, going “I don’t understand” or something like that.

        • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          My family has our own accent. I don’t know why, we just do. We don’t sound like anyone I knew growing up. Voice control has never worked for me.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think this happened to me once when the assistant was trying to use another clock app than the native one.

  • evatronic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    The enshitification of Assistant is what prompted me, a few months ago, to embark on a quest to remove Google (and other cloud-based services) from my home automation setup. I’ve since swapped over to Home Assistant using Zigbee for almost everything.

    I had to keep the Alexa integration going, or the other half would lose their god damned mind because apparently, that’s the only way on the entire planet to turn the light by the couch on and off.

    But yeah, next up is just replacing all the light switches with zigbee-enabled ones so I can go full scary motion detection in a room thing. It’s going to be super futuristic in here, like 1998!

    • lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Home Assistant actually has its own voice control now. You can even set it up to trigger on the wake word “Alexa”

      • BobOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think that’s the funniest part. Like, as far as I know, the regular Assistant uses the same approach to handling data that buzzword AI things use, a neural network. But branding (and potentially internal company politics) is weird, so they decided to kneecap Assistant in order to make Gemini look better on release.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Generative AI is different, it can generate better responses that aren’t just programmed canned responses. However I fully agree with you, they’re trying their hardest to do a bullshit rebrand with it. They could have just swapped it out with assistant and I would have been ecstatic. By rebranding it I get that same bad taste in my mouth whenever marketing elbows themselves into the conversation.

          • Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            So… Literally the same voice input, but now with more time overhead waiting for responses so that it can be a bit more human sounding?

      • Jz5678910@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s not, basic functionality has been lost, and instead of completing your requests, it initiates a search/conversation.

        A few commands did work and it routed it through Assistant, but after failing my daily tasks I promptly uninstalled.

        • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Don’t you have to install the Gemini app for all the features now? The app that specifically states it’s “experimental”

          • Jz5678910@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            When you asked the answer was yes, but, then after a day or two they actually force enabled WITHOUT the app being installed. At least for me and a few others online.

            • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Have you found it better than it used to be? I guess I’m not surprised, but Gemini also does not seem super well tested

              • Jz5678910@lemdro.id
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                It was better than the first day when I tried it, but still not fully functional, I’ve moved back to Google Assistant again. It doesn’t do all of the “Home” commands and it struggles with setting up calendar events and reminders.

          • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            Nah, this is Google’s version of ChatGPT with speech to text and text to speech. Unlike Siri, it can hold a real conversation, the problem is that it’s worse as an actual assistant for the moment.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    To be fair, to some degree this is exactly the use case stochastic parrots (the thing we call ‘AI’ as a buzzword) can truly excel at:

    • Interpeting the bullshit we stammer out when we try to give a verbal command while totally not adhering to any reliable command structure.
    • Formulating a reply that sounds like fairly natural language despite how inane the sources used might be.

    So yeah, we’re finally at a real use case. Gimme! And from briefly trying it, Gemini is better at figuring things out from impresice input than Assistant was.

    Make no mistake, it’s ultimately the same backend. They just swapped the processing layer between audio-to-text parsing and running inputs from them (and again on the way back). Sadly no Google Now smartness at all, we’ve lost that forever. But hey, at least this improves stuff.

  • rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Google removed “Ok Google with the screen off” (made the toggle disappear, replaced with the option to allow its use in apps) on my Moto Z Play via Play Services updates and later advertised it as a Pixel-exclusive feature. (this was when the Pixel 1 was new)

    Their support threads were ended curtly with statements of the phone not supporting the feature which I guess was technically true now that they changed it. (but no, the hardware always supported hotwords)

    Never got that feature back and I bailed. For the ups and downs, I’m glad Apple doesn’t do that, instead omitting or handicapping new features for older devices. Of course not the best but yeesh, at least I don’t have to worry about “Hey Siri” being pulled to promote the iPhone 20 yet…

    • ben_dover@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      yeah Apple doesn’t take away your features, it just slows down your old device altogether so you’re forced to buy a new one

      • rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Honestly I’d disagree. Past the iPhone 4S, my iPhone 8 was fine through it’s life before being replaced with a 13 mini a year or two ago when it suffered a naked gravitational incident at my hands. My parent’s generally had hand-me-downs or used models and dad’s 6s is still kicking and performing alright and even got a security patch a month ago.

        They had that battery snafu which I will absolutely fault their lack of transparency for (good ol’ hide-the-workings-from-customers Apple) but I did encounter the issue it sought to trade performance for preventing in the past. (a worn battery causing random reboots on my 6s)

        Now my BlackBerry Priv? I miss that phone but I did not miss it’s combination of slowing down with age plus updates running out at 6.0.1. Worst of both worlds but I miss sliders and Blackberry’s additions. (not the size though)

        Similar in age (2015 models) but I doubt dad would be as tolerant of how it performed even a few years ago.

      • Custodian1623@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        that’s generally how computers work though? Updated OS is more resource intensive and require upgrades after some time. My current iphone launched like 6 years ago and is running fine - yes there have been generation bumps that were rough for iPhone but is it supposed to last 10-15 years?

        • Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I have a deep hatred for companies that used to create responsive software pivoting info feature bloat over time. Discord used to be blazing fast. It proved that you could design software based on chromium without it being slow and unresponsive.

          What happened? It’s just as crappy as everything else nowadays. Every new feature that gets added reduces performance by less than 1% so nobody gives a shit?

          Same for apple. They don’t care that all those cool iOS additions keep making the phone slower. But I do and that’s why I prefer custom OS. Nobody will decide that this feature is worth x amount of memory/battery/whatever but me.

        • Luke@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          that’s generally how computers work though? Updated OS is more resource intensive and require upgrades

          That’s not how computers work unless you have an OS that intentionally creates that situation. Devices with Linux on them don’t get any slower over the years. Sometimes an old device even gets faster with OS updates because the OS isn’t being written by a corporation intent on driving you to new purchases incessantly.

          • Custodian1623@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I agree with you,I use FOSS software and old hardware all the time. I should have specified better but my point is that this is something that generally happens in the consumer electronics world. it doesn’t make sense as a dig against Apple in this context (comparing with competitors), given that iPhones don’t have a particularly short life cycle against competitors

            • Luke@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I feel like that’s just a longer way of saying “they all do it, so why bother mentioning it”, which is a lot more defeatist than I think we ought to be. Pointing out anti-consumer behavior is worthwhile for more than merely a simple dig.

              • Custodian1623@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I’m not in disagreement with you, but I personally find dry “apple bad” takes to be a little overdone

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Google have really enshittified their services, to the point where I’ve seriously thought about using Bing as my search engine instead.

  • ShadowAndFlame@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Enabling it completely breaks Reminders, btw. Or at least it has so far for me. It won’t let me set a reminder and previously set reminders don’t send a push notification. Other assistant things like timers and playing songs seems to hand off to Assistant correctly.

    Edit: they seemed to have fixed this. Reminders function normally now.

  • danhakimi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I disabled the Google App back when “Google Now” was still a thing. Remember when it would give you directions to get where you were going after you were already on your way? I’d be on the train, it’d tell me “oh, you wanna go somewhere? Get off the train, take a cab to the nearest train station, get on the train…”

    They removed everything but sports score tracking, I kept using it for a while, and then I realized that I could just fucking use my browser for search, since that’s where I wanted to read search results anyway. And that’s what I did.

    They’re going to keep doing this again and again, making their app worse and worse.

    No idea why I would ever want the Google app back.

  • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Probably not the direction they’re going, but having this run offline like most of Pixels “AI” features would be great. I think the hardest part is the dataset training though, just having an offline assistant that works would be a win even if it wasn’t a LLM.

    I’m trying to put distance between me and these data collection points and it’s hard.

  • 13617@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Only realized how Terrible Google assistant was when I started to use it with Android Auto.