In 2019, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez questioned Michael Cohen about Donald Trump. Cohen’s answers eventually led to Letitia James’s fraud lawsuit.

  • Melkath@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Correct, but not how I think you are framing it.

    AOC, one of the 5 not corrupt members of the DNC, but the longer she stays in bed with them, the more fleas she will accumulate.

    She is eligible for this Presidential election. She should go for it.

      • Melkath@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oof, that is actually a big one I didn’t readily know.

        The longer she remains a Dem, the more corrupt she is going to get. That is a definite.

      • Melkath@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Bernie, AOC, Katie Porter, Ro Khanna, Rashida Tlaib.

        Those are the 5 Democrats that I currently trust and believe not to be corrupt.

        • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          This, right here. ☝🏼

          (Maybe the Presidency would be better off as a quorum. Right after the guillotines get packed away and everyone’s learned once again what treason gets you.)

        • anon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          In the weeks leading up to her election:

          what is happening in Palestine is a massacre

          After election:

          MH: You, in the campaign, made one tweet, or made one statement, that referred to a killing by Israeli soldiers of civilians in Gaza and called it a “massacre,” which became a little bit controversial. But I haven’t seen anywhere — what is your position on Israel?

          AOC: Well, I believe absolutely in Israel’s right to exist. I am a proponent of a two-state solution. And for me, it’s not — this is not a referendum, I think, on the state of Israel. For me, the lens through which I saw this incident, as an activist, as an organizer, if sixty people were killed in Ferguson, Missouri, if sixty people were killed in the South Bronx — unarmed — if sixty people were killed in Puerto Rico — I just looked at that incident more through . . . through just, as an incident, and to me, it would just be completely unacceptable if that happened on our shores. But I am —

          MH: Of course the dynamic there in terms of geopolitics —

          AOC: Of course.

          MH: And the war in the Middle East is very different than people expressing their First Amendment right to protest.

          AOC: Well, yes. But I also think that what people are starting to see at least in the occupation of Palestine is just an increasing crisis of humanitarian condition, and that to me is just where I tend to come from on this issue.

          MH: You use the term “the occupation of Palestine”? What did you mean by that?

          AOC: Oh, um [pause] I think it, what I meant is the settlements that are increasing in some of these areas and places where Palestinians are experiencing difficulty in access to their housing and homes.

          MH: Do you think you can expand on that?

          AOC: Yeah, I mean, I think I’d also just [waves hands and laughs] I am not the expert on geopolitics on this issue. You know, for me, I’m a firm believer in finding a two-state solution on this issue, and I’m happy to sit down with leaders on both of these. For me, I just look at things through a human rights lens, and I may not use the right words [laughs] I know this is a very intense issue.

          MH: That’s very honest, that’s very honest. It’s very honest, and when, you, you know, get to Washington and you’re an elected member of Congress you’ll have the opportunity to talk to people on all sides and visit Israel and visit the West Bank and —

          AOC: Absolutely, absolutely. And I think that that’s one of those things that’s important too is that, you know, especially with the district that I represent — I come from the South Bronx, I come from a Puerto Rican background, and Middle Eastern politics was not exactly at my kitchen table every night. But, I also recognize that this is an intensely important issue for people in my district, for Americans across the country, and I think what’s at least important to communicate is that I’m willing to listen and that I’m willing to learn and evolve on this issue like I think many Americans are.

          https://jacobin.com/2018/07/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-israel-palestine-occupation

          Toast from day one.

          • lolrightythen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            All I’m reading is that she isn’t particularly knowledgeable about middle eastern politics. How does that serve as evidence of her corruption?

            • Melkath@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I tend to go with this interpretation.

              And unlike Schumer, she is delicate about walking the line between being against Israel’s actions in Gaza and saying something stupid (IE: Israel direly needs aid to help the people suffering in Gaza!).