Itā€™s a brief mention in PIC S3. As the crew approaches the restored Enterprise-D at the Fleet Museum, La Forge makes a stray comment, to the effect of:

ā€¦and obviously we canā€™t use the Enterprise-E

at which point, everyone turns to Worf, who insists with indignation,

That was not my fault.

Thereā€™s a beat as everyone makes a face and gives each other a knowing look, and thenā€¦ thatā€™s it.

Itā€™s clearly meant to be a wink and a nod from the writers: ā€œYes, we know you want to know what happened to the E, and no, we arenā€™t going to tell you.ā€

Even the behind-the-scenes materials are mum on the topic. The Star Trek: Picard Logs, posted on Instagram, mention both an incident at Kriilar Prime that apparently led to Worfā€™s departure, as well as a subsequent classified mission after which the ship was taken out of service. (To me, this seems at odds with what is shown on-screen: itā€™s obvious that Worf had something to do with the Eā€™s demise, and itā€™s also obvious that the story is common knowledge ā€“ even known to Crusher, who has been ā€œout of the loopā€ for 20 years. So I think neither of the Logsā€™ stories are satisfactory explanations.)

But, as I just alluded to, there are a few things we can infer about what happened to the E.

First, thereā€™s no way it was destroyed and no way it resulted in any loss of life. For one, La Forgeā€™s tone is too glib for that ā€“ thereā€™s no way he would describe the destruction of a starship in those terms. But more importantly, thereā€™s no way that Worf would shirk responsibility for such a thing.

Second, we know itā€™s something unusual, memorable, and (in my opinion) decidedly unclassified. And, I would argue, it seems like itā€™s somethingā€¦ funny. Or perhaps whimsical or ironic or otherwise something that itā€™s polite to strike a glib tone regarding.

Finally, I would suggest that, whatever it was, it happened around 2384. We get a brief sighting of the E in the battle of the end of Prodigyā€™s first season (though itā€™s a little unclear whether it was actually supposed to be the Enterprise or the Sovereign) so we know itā€™s active at least until then. But it seems unlikely that any loss of a starship after the Attack on Mars in 2385 would be considered a laughable matter. Whatā€™s more, we need the -E to be out of service early enough for the -F to have a reasonable career before being decommissioned in 2401. Assuming that a loss of a starship in the wake of the Romulan Supernova would also not be a laughing matter, that would push an -F launch date perhaps as late as 2389, which seems like an implausibly short service tenure. Retiring the -E in '84 gives some flexibility for when to launch the -F and still give it a long enough service life.

So, what do you think? What are some scenarios that could satisfy the clues weā€™ve been given? (Iā€™ll put a couple of my ideas in the comments!)

  • Equals@startrek.websiteOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    I propose that the Enterprise-E became somehow entangled in something it could not be removed from. I have a mental image of the ship somehow stuck in ā€œspatial quicksandā€ or maybe an infinite timeloop ā€“ some situation where Captain Worf saved the crew and the ship but then was not given the resources needed to extricate the vessel, leaving it to be abandoned in its place.

    More heroically, perhaps the Enterprise-E ā€œsaved the dayā€ by hooking itself into, say, the mainframe and physical hull of some starbase that suffering from some sort of collapse of software and/or hardware ā€“ saving the station from imminent destruction, but irrevocably welding the ship and station together. Again, perhaps Worf thought heā€™d be given support from Starfleet to eventually extricate the ship, which would explain why he would later feel justified claiming that the shipā€™s ultimate fate ā€œwas not his faultā€.