The ruling, in a case brought by a Hamburger Mary’s restaurant, pauses enforcement of the state’s new “Protection of Children” law, which prohibits admitting children to an “adult live performance.”

  • HotDogFingies@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Correct. Misleading wording like this is how they manage to trick ignorant people into supporting hateful laws like this one - assuming they’re not supporting these laws precisely because they’re hateful.

    The LGBTQ+ community (including drag queens) absolutely and unequivocally does NOT support pedophilia in any form. This includes exposing children to pornographic material. That’s fucking canon and you can quote me on that shit.

    • Monomate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s some videos floating around of drag shows with sensual dancing with children present. I’m not saying all Drag presentations are like this, but maybe the law should’ve been more specific to these kinds of situations.

      • Fneec@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or, very unorthodox idea I know, but how about parents check what kind of show they’re attending with their children?

        • Snapz@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          And they do, parents who actually take their kids to story tone or shows aren’t the ones that are upset.

          The people who are upset (terrified) are grandma death and uncle Karl. They live in kansas, they’ve never seen or spoken to an actual trans person, yet they open their trash can lids slowly because they think one is inevitably “gonna jump out and bite 'em!”. Ignorance is a plague.

          Trans people are people.

        • HotDogFingies@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is exactly it. It’s about parental responsibility. You wouldn’t play a movie for a child without checking the rating. And, if you do, it’s not the director’s fault that little Timmy saw The Virgin Suicides.

          • EvilColeslaw@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The movie thing is also quite an apt example. It is totally legal for a child to see an R-rated movie with their parent. R rated movies are allowed to have nudity, simulated sex scenes, etc etc etc. Much more inappropriate for a child than being read an age-approriate story by a drag queen or seeing someone in drag dancing and singing on stage. But this law about drag performance makes no exceptions for parental responsibility. A parent could conceivably be convicted of a misdemeanor for taking their child to a family friendly drag show.

      • PupBiru@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        and there’s videos online of child abuse but that doesn’t mean that everyone is a child abuser

        drag
        is
        not
        inherently
        sexual

        there are already laws to protect kids from that sort of content, and most drag performers probably wholeheartedly agree that they should be enforced, whether it’s for a drag show, a kids magic performance, or story time at preschool

      • Snapz@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Some videos floating around” huh? “I know a guy who saw a thing”, “people are saying these things, okay?”

        You’re speaking of vapor, that said there are always single sensationalized “examples” that have nothing to do with the common reality for every argument by hollow, frightened, bigots.

        Cling to “your truth” for dear life…